The average price of regular gas today is 4.55. Are you predicting it would take at least 2 months to get it to drop to 4.30ish range if the war ended today? If so, we're not going to agree. Luckily, the war will end eventually and we'll get to find out how quickly the price moves.
Yes. I believe that.
This is a decent article that explains a little better what I was trying to say in posts above.
(Edit)
However, one thing I will add is that Trump has more leverage over high-level CEO's than the average president. He will absolutely, positively push to get prices down as fast as possible (AKA threaten the oil execs with some kind of retribution that is likely illegal but since it is obvious at this point that nobody is going to hold this administration to task for any illegal activity, will probably be believed). The recovery here will likely be better than other countries.
https://twitter.com/unseen1_unseen/status/2067594004372300068?s=46
Gas prices dropped from 4.56 to 3.99 in 28 days and the war wasn't over for a majority of the time.
@snarlcakes i just paid $4.89. and my shipping costs have gone up under trump. and fed ex has added sur charges and minimums and other shit. trump has had some nasty self-inflicted wounds. his ratings should be in the gutter
@snarlcakes i just paid $4.89. and my shipping costs have gone up under trump. and fed ex has added sur charges and minimums and other shit. trump has had some nasty self-inflicted wounds. his ratings should be in the gutter
I posted it because Squeaky didn't think gas prices would drop quickly. I disagreed and said they would drop faster. And I was right😉 Also, they'll continue to fall.
Trump's ratings should be in the 70+ range. What he has done with immigration and moving thr Overton window earns him at least a B. You're going to f#ck around and get socialists elected. And then you get to find out what f#cking terrible looks like.
@snarlcakes that's why i want him to get focused. stop fing with iran. stop being beholden to israel. get prices down. at all costs. then we wont have to worry about they lunatic left
@snarlcakes that's why i want him to get focused. stop fing with iran. stop being beholden to israel. get prices down. at all costs. then we wont have to worry about they lunatic left
Nah. Drag this 60 deal negotiation period out, get a couple extensions, get past the midterms, then go fuck Iran up some more.
Open the Strait by force.
Nixon's approval rating at the end of his disgraceful presidency was 24%. Trump is approaching that territory.
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Sinks to 30% in Worst Poll Yet - Newsweek
Even worse for the Trump in battleground Pennsylvania, where his approval ratings are in freefall.
F&M Poll: Trump Approval Rating Drops 10 Points
At the same time, Shapiro is enormously popular.
This will likely have important implications in key Congressional districts including PA 7, 8 and 10.
He's losing men.
Donald Trump’s Net Approval Among Men Slips—New Poll - Newsweek
Instead of picking a single poll, why do you not use RCP who aggregates and averages many polls?
The only things worse than Trump's approval ratings are those of the RNC (-16.3%) and the Dems, bringing up the rear (-17.3%).
He's losing men.
Donald Trump’s Net Approval Among Men Slips—New Poll - Newsweek
Instead of picking a single poll, why do you not use RCP who aggregates and averages many polls?
The only things worse than Trump's approval ratings are those of the RNC (-16.3%) and the Dems, bringing up the rear (-17.3%).
Feel free to use the aggregate.
I don't, because some polls are better than others. The Focaldata/Financial Times polling, which is referenced in the article I cited, is widely regarded as non-partisan, reliable and reputable.
Also, much more important than raw numbers in polls are trends. The trendlines are bad for Trump.
History tells us that a sitting president's approval ratings are highly relevant as midterms approach. The sitting president's party almost always loses seats in the midterms, even under the best of circumstances. When the president's approval ratings are low, the losses are much greater.
Midterms largely serve as a referendum on the sitting president's performance.
He's losing men.
Donald Trump’s Net Approval Among Men Slips—New Poll - Newsweek
Instead of picking a single poll, why do you not use RCP who aggregates and averages many polls?
The only things worse than Trump's approval ratings are those of the RNC (-16.3%) and the Dems, bringing up the rear (-17.3%).
Feel free to use the aggregate.
I don't, because some polls are better than others. The Focaldata/Financial Times polling, which is referenced in the article I cited, is widely regarded as non-partisan, reliable and reputable.
Also, much more important than raw numbers in polls are trends. The trendlines are bad for Trump.
History tells us that a sitting president's approval ratings are highly relevant as midterms approach. The sitting president's party almost always loses seats in the midterms, even under the best of circumstances. When the president's approval ratings are low, the losses are much greater.
Midterms largely serve as a referendum on the sitting president's performance.
In that case, if Trump doesn't lose the House bigly, then will you acknowledge the polling was off and not a good indicator for voters?
He's losing men.
Donald Trump’s Net Approval Among Men Slips—New Poll - Newsweek
Instead of picking a single poll, why do you not use RCP who aggregates and averages many polls?
The only things worse than Trump's approval ratings are those of the RNC (-16.3%) and the Dems, bringing up the rear (-17.3%).
Feel free to use the aggregate.
I don't, because some polls are better than others. The Focaldata/Financial Times polling, which is referenced in the article I cited, is widely regarded as non-partisan, reliable and reputable.
Also, much more important than raw numbers in polls are trends. The trendlines are bad for Trump.
History tells us that a sitting president's approval ratings are highly relevant as midterms approach. The sitting president's party almost always loses seats in the midterms, even under the best of circumstances. When the president's approval ratings are low, the losses are much greater.
Midterms largely serve as a referendum on the sitting president's performance.
In that case, if Trump doesn't lose the House bigly, then will you acknowledge the polling was off and not a good indicator for voters?
Trump wouldn't have pushed gerrymeander cheating if he wasn't worried about the polls.