You'll be embarrassed that you ever supported him and that you compromised your conservative principles on many issues to do so.in a couple years you’ll deny that you ever supported Trump.
I’d be proud to say that Trump agreed with me on many issues and became president.
Top lawyers that have read it say it was a good case and Trump had a very good chance of being convicted.
Any lawyer who draws meaningful conclusions simply by reading the unchallenged written report of a prosecutor, which report is not filed under a standard imposed by court rules. is not a top lawyer
That is a dumb take. Any lawyer with an IQ above 50 could find meaningful conclusions from a well-written report from a prosecutor. Of course, it is poorly written or doesn't contain the facts of the case then sure no one could draw a conclusion from it.
You're just finding excuses to pretend like your OPINION is the only valid one, even in the mountains of evidence showing that you're biased and wrong.
It's not at all poorly written.
justice.gov/storage/Report-of-Special-Counsel-Smith-Volume-1-January-2025.pdf
Judge Cannon, who couldn't possibly be more obviously in the bag for Trump, is preventing the document case report from being released.
I had a typo. Meant if it was poorly written
or the illegally stacked Supreme Court.
It wasn't "illegally stacked" and this has been explained to you several times. Was it unconventional? Yes. Unfair? Sure. Was it illegal? No. Stop with that BS.
@co-hoosier there is absolutely no doubt you've done so.
Lol. A prosecutor’s self-serving, unchallenged comments, and submitted outside judicial rules of procedure do not deserve my time. That has the status of an op-ed to the New York Times. I wouldn’t read that either.
there is absolutely no doubt you've done so.
Then give me your best examples.
Edit: I’m tired of your vague unspecific references to me compromising my principles. Time for you to put up or STFU about that.
or the illegally stacked Supreme Court.
It wasn't "illegally stacked" and this has been explained to you several times. Was it unconventional? Yes. Unfair? Sure. Was it illegal? No. Stop with that BS.
Sorry, not illegal but was still complete bull sh** to unfairly stack the court.
It should have been illegal but there are no repercussions for being trash. We are finding a ton of gray areas that the founders failed to be more clear on. But they probably never expected the current environment of the ends justify the means at all costs.
Lol. A prosecutor’s self-serving, unchallenged comments, and submitted outside judicial rules of procedure do not deserve my time. That has the status of an op-ed to the New York Times. I wouldn’t read that either.
uh huh sure
@hurryinghoosiers oh no YOU didn't read it. everyone else knew exactly what was in it. don't try to project your continued ignorance on others. that you vote without any idea of what's going on is frankly disgusting. if it has a D you're all in. beyond vapid
@aloha-hoosier he gets a B. He's been solid.
Trump's grades:
Border: A
Deportations: A
Economy: B-/C+
Foreign Policy: B (can go up or down depending on Iran )
Mean Words: D
@aloha-hoosier you don't know top lawyers nor have any idea who are "top lawyers."
Each of Trumps appointees voted with the liberal wing of the court on occasion. What is complete BS? What is your problem?
@scam-likely LMFAO from the board creep/misfit who denied woke even exists. you and hickory need a thread where you can just go back and forth. dumb and dumber. the last two wokesters on the planet. now take the tip of your thumb and the tip of your index finger and go back to abusing your pecker you goofy ass