@aloha-hoosier And the fact that its just so casually discussed...and brushed off by millions... astonishing to me. Vance, DeSantis, Rubio, Haley, Scott, Shapiro, Beshear, Moore... can we just have a normal human being to argue about again?
@iunorth there's some nuance here and it's different times. remember jerry seinfeld was dating a 17 year old at 39. he was picking her up from high school. don johnson melanie griffith. fergie justin timberlake. that wilmer guy and his chick. it goes on and on and on. unfortunately it's a gross hollywood wealthy people thing. that's different than imo the scheme of what transpired with epstein and how he prayed on these chicks. if trump was complicit in doing same he would have been indicted and sued as well. scarola said he had no evidence. he represented 20 plus plaintiffs. do i think at that time trump was going into beauty pageant dressing rooms and checking out 17 year old girls. of course. do i think we was waiting outside of schools to get middle schoolers. no. untoward. creepy. different time. if there were evidence indict him. the statute never runs in many jurisdictions for minors with tolling and all sorts of stuff you can use to file later
but again that htis has become a hot topic means we aren't screaming about historic inflation, historic gas, historic numbers crossing the board, having to buy an electric car, or 12 years old being abused and having their genitals cut off.
There’s plenty of evidence the guy has been a womanizer, adulterer, looked at naked underaged girls, and was found civilly responsible for a sexual assault, etc.. There’s a lot of smoke and demonstrated sexual misbehavior but nothing that says he’s an actual pedophile.
The bolded part contradicts the underlined part.
You can be a pedophile without being a child rapist.
pe·do·phile
/ˈpedəˌfīl/
noun
a person who is sexually attracted to children.
You would not likely scheme up ways to gaze at naked girls without repercussions, unless you were attracted to them in some way.
"You can't make someone listen to reason if they aren't willing to think"-- Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
@shooter LOL you must be the dumbest "scientist" on the planet. you're without question one of the dumbest people i've ever read. i'd suggest that's not quite the DSM definition
@shooter here's the reality. you're a gov ee. trump is a billionaire. he thinks people like you are total betas. you became an incredibly woke person and bought in to everything AOC and the young college kid progressives sold. we've learned that it was inane policy. that woke betas are mocked by real men, put on sidewalks, and now you can't debate or do anything other than lash out at trump at every turn with your newest thing to call him a pedophile. you have no idea what a pedophile even is. you're a moron who no normal men like who is lashing out at anything that you hope might stick bc you're so angry that most people don't see things like you
dictionary.com: an adult who is sexually attracted to young children.
Britannica: a person with sexual interest in prepubescent children
Webster: sexual perversion in which children are the preferred sexual object
OED: sexual attraction to children (of either sex) that may cause deviant behaviour.
"You can't make someone listen to reason if they aren't willing to think"-- Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
Stop cheapening the word to score points in an argument. It's disrespectful to the kids who have been traumatized by it. Children there refers to prepubescent kids. Does it make it OK for a grown man to scope out and prey on teenagers? No, that's creepy. But pedophilia is something different.There’s plenty of evidence the guy has been a womanizer, adulterer, looked at naked underaged girls, and was found civilly responsible for a sexual assault, etc.. There’s a lot of smoke and demonstrated sexual misbehavior but nothing that says he’s an actual pedophile.
The bolded part contradicts the underlined part.
You can be a pedophile without being a child rapist.
pe·do·phile
/ˈpedəˌfīl/
noun
a person who is sexually attracted to children.
You would not likely scheme up ways to gaze at naked girls without repercussions, unless you were attracted to them in some way.
@hurryinghoosiers hickory what data?
compare inflation rates?border numbers?
crime?
gas prices?
go. Let’s compare. Otherwise you’re just doing more bad faith posting
Gas prices haven't changed and havent seen you provide data to back up your shit posts. So must mean you are bad faith posting
@shooter i love what a beta you are. you don't reply. you talk shit without replyign etc. it's why you got put on the sidewalk. your offensive post is exactly why this has always been prohibited by unclemark and bitched about by aloha and others. dsm has had historical definitions. do you know the dsm?
did you look at your definitions? prepubescent. that can be an 8 year old. young children. that can be 5. there's zero evidence trump was involved in any such activity yet here you are. pretty pathetic. pretty gross. all you. all the time.
Gas prices haven’t changed
that's the point. they went up like crazy under biden adn have stabilized under trump. just like inflation. want to debate the other issues? want to talk inflation? gas spikes? border numbers? you're bad faith posting again because you know i've posted htem a thousand times. but you've got nothin so you just disappear without responding to same. you aren't fulling anyone hickory. the board knows. you're trying to go to war with a pea shooter and asthma
Pedophilia is different and I think you know that. The posts I @ you on are pretty explicitly slandering Trump.However, accusing someone of sexual misconduct when the person has no record at all of sexual misconduct is higher on the scale of “out of line” than accusing someone who has a demonstrated history of such behavior, right?
Now maybe more evidence comes out--I agree there's smoke. Most likely it doesn't, based on the length of time, no lawsuits, etc.
It's tough to stick by your principles to defend someone you despise. But if you can't do it, then they aren't really principles, are they?
@shooter here's a simple idea. don't be a beta and talk shit. i saw what you posted in teh other thread to lars regarding shitting. you ALWAYS start it but can't back anything up because you're just a weak, fat beta. don't start shit and not expect a response. i don't like passive aggressive betas like you. at all. i don't tolerate them. hooky said it best that we shouldn't have to put up with you. he's right. no one should.
@shooter here's a simple idea. don't be a beta and talk shit.
Don't respond to me, asshole. Just STFU. You lie about me constantly and ramble on and on like a broken record with your worthless ignorant rants. Really, just STFU, Mr. 3 tit nitwit.
"You can't make someone listen to reason if they aren't willing to think"-- Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
@shooter FU fatty. we all know who you are. you posted about me FIRST to lars. Stop lying. you post about me you can expect a response. do you need to be baker acted. we've all caught you on your endless lies. do you not know you're lying?
you're a beta and can't back anything. add to it you're dumber than shit so post things acting like trump is out there abusing grade school kids and shit. you're a fat, dumb, beta, who i guarantee doesn't have a friend in the world, and who if he had an ounce of sense wouldn't post to people who could put him on the sidewalk.
A beta is someone who doesn't know how to inflate a tire, who squats to pee, whose wife leaves him for a chick. Look in your mirror, shitboy.
"You can't make someone listen to reason if they aren't willing to think"-- Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451