@goat there’s random points. I’ll screenshot it tonight and send it out haha
Thank you for reading Hoosier Huddle
@thehoosierhuddle Oh if the points are random, I'm sure that lucky bastard @bradstevens would catch that shit.
@goat if those state charges were stayed or tolled he better cut a deal with Putin to set him up if the Dems win. He’s got a better chance of that than trying to cancel elections.
Of course. Like I said, I don't expect it. But I do think, if we live in that rare universe where it actually happens, you're going to see @dbmhoosier and @co-hoosier and @carramrod and maybe a few others totally explaining why it's legal and justified.
No I wouldn't support that but I remember what many of your fellow comrades advocated for after our last free and fair election without mail in balloting and zero possibility of fraud.
https://twitter.com/i/status/2078637616875098554
How was 24 not a free and fair election?
With mass mail in balloting there is always voter fraud. Doesn't mean there's election fraud. And the Dems didn't even have a primary and were able to change horses mid race. Biden was the nominee.
@goat if those state charges were stayed or tolled he better cut a deal with Putin to set him up if the Dems win. He’s got a better chance of that than trying to cancel elections.
Of course. Like I said, I don't expect it. But I do think, if we live in that rare universe where it actually happens, you're going to see @dbmhoosier and @co-hoosier and @carramrod and maybe a few others totally explaining why it's legal and justified.
No I wouldn't support that but I remember what many of your fellow comrades advocated for after our last free and fair election without mail in balloting and zero possibility of fraud.
https://twitter.com/i/status/2078637616875098554
You might have a point if then President Obama tried to do that. The only President who has tried to overturn the results of an election in our lifetime was President Trump in 2020.
dbm will link Trumpster Twitter Twits saying it was legal and necessary.
COH will post a lot of stuff then proclaim it's a nothingburger.
Farve will post as if he’s a world renowned legal scholar and say it was legal and justified.
Of course. Like I said, I don't expect it. But I do think, if we live in that rare universe where it actually happens, you're going to see @dbmhoosier and @co-hoosier and @carramrod and maybe a few others totally explaining why it's legal and justified.
Why do you guys engage in mindless unlikely speculation about Trump election rigging when we have a real life example of the Democrats already covering the field?
@co-hoosier What do you think about this attempt to change federal and state laws by Executive Order?
No opinion. Cant read the article; haven’t seen the EO and haven’t seen the court filings.
I can read it and I don’t pay for it. You can find another article on it in 20 seconds if you search for it. I gave you a link to all the EOs yesterday, you can read it yourself. I also linked that particular EO a while back as an example of the kind of EO you and I previously opposed. I still oppose it. It would be really nice if you’d bother to read stuff like this. Is part of your retirement plan to willfully ignore information you might not like?No opinion. Cant read the article; haven’t seen the EO and haven’t seen the court filings.
I oppose the EO on substantive legal grounds.
I also don’t agree as a matter of policy.
Appealing to the judicial branch obviously tells us Trump is not changing the law. In fact, I don’t think the EO changes the law on its face.