We have an election thread somewhere. Can we use this one to focus on what Fauci knew and when he knew it, or, at least a higher minded review of COVID policies and lessons learned from that era?There are mountains of circumstantial evidence.
Why wouldn't you respond to me? You have no evidence the election wasn't secure (just as the President's DoJ, hired analysts and most of his staff told him), and you don't want to answer my simple question?
I said the election was less reliable and less secure because of hastily enacted emergency leniency measures. That’s pretty much undeniable.
There is no good process to detect voting misconduct after the fact. That is why pre- voting security measures are so important.
One lesson--that is shocking--is that higher ups in the scientific/medical community will coordinate to smear those who dissent. That's not good and we should institute some controls in govt agencies to ensure that doesn't happen again--no matter which party or concern tries it in the future.
One lesson--that is shocking--is that higher ups in the scientific/medical community will coordinate to smear those who dissent.
Excellent point. There are 2 problems. Many deny this sort of “deep state” activity. The first step is to recognize this problem. The second problem is freedom of speech.
We have an election thread somewhere. Can we use this one to focus on what Fauci knew and when he knew it, or, at least a higher minded review of COVID policies and lessons learned from that era?There are mountains of circumstantial evidence.
Why wouldn't you respond to me? You have no evidence the election wasn't secure (just as the President's DoJ, hired analysts and most of his staff told him), and you don't want to answer my simple question?
I said the election was less reliable and less secure because of hastily enacted emergency leniency measures. That’s pretty much undeniable.
There is no good process to detect voting misconduct after the fact. That is why pre- voting security measures are so important.
One lesson--that is shocking--is that higher ups in the scientific/medical community will coordinate to smear those who dissent. That's not good and we should institute some controls in govt agencies to ensure that doesn't happen again--no matter which party or concern tries it in the future.
The key questions are…
Will he admit his mistakes?
Will he tell the truth?
We have an election thread somewhere. Can we use this one to focus on what Fauci knew and when he knew it, or, at least a higher minded review of COVID policies and lessons learned from that era?There are mountains of circumstantial evidence.
Why wouldn't you respond to me? You have no evidence the election wasn't secure (just as the President's DoJ, hired analysts and most of his staff told him), and you don't want to answer my simple question?
I said the election was less reliable and less secure because of hastily enacted emergency leniency measures. That’s pretty much undeniable.
There is no good process to detect voting misconduct after the fact. That is why pre- voting security measures are so important.
One lesson--that is shocking--is that higher ups in the scientific/medical community will coordinate to smear those who dissent. That's not good and we should institute some controls in govt agencies to ensure that doesn't happen again--no matter which party or concern tries it in the future.
The key questions are…
Will he admit his mistakes?
Will he tell the truth?
@Shooter or Fauci?
The answer is no.
Nothing to see here folks. Same old same old.
Good lord. That link is a total POS. But what would you expect from this guy?
https://www.npr.org/people/297147967/ari-daniel
Fauci has done enormous damage to the credibility of government in scientific matters that should be objective. While we expect misinformation and deception in politics and policy, we shouldn’t see it in science and objective reality.
Fauci fucking lied to us!!! It matters but your pride won’t acknowledge how bad this was from “Mr Science”. He and others tried to destroy medical professionals who were right!! I am going to shut up now because I promised myself not to get in anymore pissing contests but God damn it!!!It’s clear some scientists and medical experts in key positions disagreed with it and said so. Personally, I thought it made great sense. Coordinated or not, they got a lot of pushback for sure. Can’t change history.2) whatever smearing was done of it wasn't a coordinated campaign,
Was there a coordinated campaign to smear the Great Barrington Declaration?AI Overview Yes, released Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) emails confirmed that top U.S. health officials organized a targeted response to discredit the Great Barrington Declaration, though mainstream public health figures defended their actions as a necessary pushback against a dangerous and scientifically flawed proposal.
The New York Times +2
Behind-the-Scenes Emails
- The "Takedown" Request: In October 2020,Francis Collins, then-director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), emailedDr. Anthony Faucicalling the declaration's authors "fringe epidemiologists" and asking for a "quick and devastating published take down of its premises".
AIER +1
- Policy Clashes: Government officials argued that the declaration's push for natural herd immunity and "focused protection" for the elderly was unscientific, unworkable, and would lead to massive loss of life.
The New York Times +1
Accusations of Suppression and Censorship
- Media and Public Rebuke: Critics and high-ranking officials publicly labeled the proposal "total nonsense" and "dangerous," while mainstream scientists mobilized counter-manifestos like the John Snow Memorandum.
The New York Times +1
- Digital Limitations: Authors of the declaration testified in congressional hearings and court cases that federal pressure on social media and search engines led to their work being de-ranked, down-voted, or temporarily removed online.
Congress.gov
Fauci fucking lied to us!!! It matters but your pride won’t acknowledge how bad this was from “Mr Science”. He and others tried to destroy medical professionals who were right!! I am going to shut up now because I promised myself not to get in anymore pissing contests but God damn it!!!
Good to see you, Stoll.
Fauci fucking lied to us!!! It matters but your pride won’t acknowledge how bad this was from “Mr Science”. He and others tried to destroy medical professionals who were right!! I am going to shut up now because I promised myself not to get in anymore pissing contests but God damn it!!!
Good to see you, Stoll.
We have to play golf sometime.Fauci fucking lied to us!!! It matters but your pride won’t acknowledge how bad this was from “Mr Science”. He and others tried to destroy medical professionals who were right!! I am going to shut up now because I promised myself not to get in anymore pissing contests but God damn it!!!
Good to see you, Stoll.
![]()
I am having a great summer. Won one member/guest including overall shootout and former PGA professional stopped drive for one at a second club.
Trying to hold off double hernia surgery until after tax season.
Hope you’re having great summer.
The discussion of the scientists with Fauci about the "furin cleavage site" and the thought at the time that it might be unnatural /engineered was already known and has been discussed many times. The person raising the concern was the virologist Kristian Anderson, as mentioned in the Fauci diary.
Why did Anderson and others INITIALLY think that the furin cleavage site was odd and unnatural? The nearest known coronavirus, SARS1, doesn't have it. Its presence, though, raises infectivity.
What you are missing here, though, is what came next. The structural features of other natural coronaviruses besides SARS1, at the time, hadn't been looked at in any detail. Kristian Anderson's group then investigated them and found that indeed several other coronaviruses from bats and pangolins DO have the furin cleavage site, NATURALLY. Kristian published the results and admitted that he had been WRONG in his initial assessment that the presence of the furin cleavage site was evidence of it being an engineered virus. It is NOT.
That's how science works. You propose a hypothesis, test it experimentally, and sometimes you prove the initial hypothesis to be wrong. You then have a new hypothesis. That gets tested, and the cycle continues. The existence of the initial flawed hypothesis is not a "gotcha" proving that the hypothesis was correct.
Kristian has written this out in case you are interested, with links: https://andersen-lab.com/secrets/data/sars-cov-2-origins/
"You can't make someone listen to reason if they aren't willing to think"-- Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
This guy is a lying sack of crap and has been since day one with the mask proclamations. There's a special place in hell for guys like him and I'll not feel even a twang of guilt about hating him when his time here in this world is done and over.
Hope is not optimism, which expects things to turn out well, but something rooted in the conviction that there is good worth working for. - Seamus Heaney, Irish poet and likely Hoosier basketball fan.
POTFB
That's how science works. You propose a hypothesis, test it experimentally,
tell people what to do, learn you were wrong, then backtrack and say "that's science." We're eternally grateful for science shutting the world down with ridiculous experiments supported by a ridiculous man in fauci
That's how science works. You propose a hypothesis, test it experimentally,
tell people what to do, learn you were wrong, then backtrack and say "that's science." We're eternally grateful for science shutting the world down with ridiculous experiments supported by a ridiculous man in fauci
@mommyshine5220 My golf game is wildly inconsistent. In the past two years I've shot 79 to 101 and every score in between. As Forrest Gump might say, my game is like a box of chocolates, and I never know what I'm going to get. I live on the 17th hole of a private course here, but I'm a member of the club and course next to it. It's very nice. In Tucson we have an Executive Course in the complex which I can play every day for no additional charge. It has four par fours on the front and the rest are par 3s. It's been great for my short game.
Not sure when I'll be back in Indiana except for Thanksgiving, but if a business trip pops up and I can make a stop in southern Indiana I'll let you know. I like to tack a few days on the beginning or the end of those trips. Looks like the next one will either be in DC or in Switzerland. Waiting for the contractor to let me know.



