It’s clear some scientists and medical experts in key positions disagreed with it and said so. Personally, I thought it made great sense. Coordinated or not, they got a lot of pushback for sure. Can’t change history.2) whatever smearing was done of it wasn't a coordinated campaign,
Was there a coordinated campaign to smear the Great Barrington Declaration?AI Overview
The New York Times +2
Behind-the-Scenes Emails
- The "Takedown" Request: In October 2020,Francis Collins, then-director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), emailedDr. Anthony Faucicalling the declaration's authors "fringe epidemiologists" and asking for a "quick and devastating published take down of its premises".
AIER +1
- Policy Clashes: Government officials argued that the declaration's push for natural herd immunity and "focused protection" for the elderly was unscientific, unworkable, and would lead to massive loss of life.
Accusations of Suppression and Censorship
- Media and Public Rebuke: Critics and high-ranking officials publicly labeled the proposal "total nonsense" and "dangerous," while mainstream scientists mobilized counter-manifestos like the John Snow Memorandum.
- Digital Limitations: Authors of the declaration testified in congressional hearings and court cases that federal pressure on social media and search engines led to their work being de-ranked, down-voted, or temporarily removed online.
Congress.gov
Listened to an interview if him on POTUS. I like the guy and he was a good hire.More on coordination:
There's nothing truly shocking or damning about Fauci in his diaries that I've read in several articles today.
Seems pretty damning he's such a narcissist, no?
Correct. And it's also just as clear those scientists and medical experts in key positions coordinated. They have emails proving it and more. I provided the links.It’s clear some scientists and medical experts in key positions disagreed with it and said so. Personally, I thought it made great sense. Coordinated or not, they got a lot of pushback for sure. Can’t change history.2) whatever smearing was done of it wasn't a coordinated campaign,
Was there a coordinated campaign to smear the Great Barrington Declaration?AI Overview
Behind-the-Scenes Emails
- The "Takedown" Request: In October 2020,Francis Collins, then-director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), emailedDr. Anthony Faucicalling the declaration's authors "fringe epidemiologists" and asking for a "quick and devastating published take down of its premises".
- Policy Clashes: Government officials argued that the declaration's push for natural herd immunity and "focused protection" for the elderly was unscientific, unworkable, and would lead to massive loss of life.
Accusations of Suppression and Censorship
- Media and Public Rebuke: Critics and high-ranking officials publicly labeled the proposal "total nonsense" and "dangerous," while mainstream scientists mobilized counter-manifestos like the John Snow Memorandum.
- Digital Limitations: Authors of the declaration testified in congressional hearings and court cases that federal pressure on social media and search engines led to their work being de-ranked, down-voted, or temporarily removed online.
Fine. Those that agreed with each other coordinated. Is this a shocker? 😎Correct. And it's also just as clear those scientists and medical experts in key positions coordinated. They have emails proving it and more. I provided the links.It’s clear some scientists and medical experts in key positions disagreed with it and said so. Personally, I thought it made great sense. Coordinated or not, they got a lot of pushback for sure. Can’t change history.2) whatever smearing was done of it wasn't a coordinated campaign,
Was there a coordinated campaign to smear the Great Barrington Declaration?AI Overview
Behind-the-Scenes Emails
- The "Takedown" Request: In October 2020,Francis Collins, then-director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), emailedDr. Anthony Faucicalling the declaration's authors "fringe epidemiologists" and asking for a "quick and devastating published take down of its premises".
- Policy Clashes: Government officials argued that the declaration's push for natural herd immunity and "focused protection" for the elderly was unscientific, unworkable, and would lead to massive loss of life.
Accusations of Suppression and Censorship
- Media and Public Rebuke: Critics and high-ranking officials publicly labeled the proposal "total nonsense" and "dangerous," while mainstream scientists mobilized counter-manifestos like the John Snow Memorandum.
- Digital Limitations: Authors of the declaration testified in congressional hearings and court cases that federal pressure on social media and search engines led to their work being de-ranked, down-voted, or temporarily removed online.
worse than this. Fauci was part of the state emergency orders hysteria regarding the election all which resulted in more insecure and unreliable voting. But most people already know this.
trump fckd up giving fauci a microphone
it became a culture virtue signal
the media bought into it fear factor
kids suffered. Businesses suffered. Funerals were missed. Weddings were missed. Preventative healthcare was missed Our gov agencies were exposed as being useless.
trust was lost.
Despite the total lack of evidence that the 2020 election was not secure, you post that. Election Denialism is very strange. How do you explain that the preelection polls predicted the election results almost exactly?worse than this. Fauci was part of the state emergency orders hysteria regarding the election all which resulted in more insecure and unreliable voting. But most people already know this.
Government used Covid to FUBAR everything it does but elections emerged as safe, secure, trustworthy and reliable as ever.
@co-hoosier Why wouldn't you respond to me? You have no evidence the election wasn't secure (just as the President's DoJ, hired analysts and most of his staff told him), and you don't want to answer my simple question?
@aloha-hoosier not having evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. It just means you don’t have it
i think Biden won for numerous reasons. But you wrote doesn’t mean much
There are mountains of circumstantial evidence.
Why wouldn't you respond to me? You have no evidence the election wasn't secure (just as the President's DoJ, hired analysts and most of his staff told him), and you don't want to answer my simple question?
I said the election was less reliable and less secure because of hastily enacted emergency leniency measures. That’s pretty much undeniable.
There is no good process to detect voting misconduct after the fact. That is why pre- voting security measures are so important.