Skip to main content

Hoosier Huddle

Does the Constituti...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Does the Constitution require birth right citizenship?

Page 15 / 19
CO. Hoosier
(@co-hoosier)
Famed Member

We have thousands, maybe millions, of people living around the world  eligible to be President who may not have spent a few weeks or months here. But yeah there is a residency requirement upon taking office. 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 4:36 pm
OneEyedUndertaker
(@oneeyedundertaker)
Noble Member

Posted by: @arthur-dent

@snarlcakes So eliminating Brown immigration while limiting White isn't any sort of reflection on Brown people?

And why were Chinese blocked 40 years before if there was NO racism? 

Were all Asians blocked?

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 4:38 pm
dbmhoosier
(@dbmhoosier)
Famed Member

Great job John and Amy. Brilliant. 

https://twitter.com/i/status/2071974352044646891


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 4:41 pm
OneEyedUndertaker
(@oneeyedundertaker)
Noble Member

Posted by: @dbmhoosier

Great job John and Amy. Brilliant. 

https://twitter.com/i/status/2071974352044646891

@arthur-dent what are their motives?  Are they neutral?

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 4:44 pm
BradStevens
(@bradstevens)
Illustrious Member

Posted by: @dbmhoosier

Great job John and Amy. Brilliant. 

https://twitter.com/i/status/2071974352044646891

Pass a law outlawing that.  

 


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 06/30/2026 4:46 pm
👍
3
Shooter
(@shooter)
Noble Member

Posted by: @dbmhoosier

It's about who is likely to improve our country and who likely destroys it.

What percentage of immigrants, legal or not, do you think are motivated by a desire to destroy our country?

 

 


"You can't make someone listen to reason if they aren't willing to think"-- Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451

ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 4:50 pm
CO. Hoosier
(@co-hoosier)
Famed Member

@shooter 

my wild guess is there’re are more now thanlast week.  


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 4:53 pm
CO. Hoosier
(@co-hoosier)
Famed Member

@bradstevens I think we have a law about this.


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 4:54 pm
dbmhoosier
(@dbmhoosier)
Famed Member

Posted by: @shooter

Posted by: @dbmhoosier

It's about who is likely to improve our country and who likely destroys it.

What percentage of immigrants, legal or not, do you think are motivated by a desire to destroy our country?

 

 

From the ones that come in illegally,  the vast majority.  They have zero intention of learning the language,  getting a decent job, following our laws, traditions, etc.  They are here only to take handouts from hard working Americans.  No other reason. 

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 5:04 pm
MyTeamIsOnTheFloor's avatar
(@myteamisonthefloor)
Reputable Member

Posted by: @dbmhoosier

Posted by: @shooter

Posted by: @dbmhoosier

It's about who is likely to improve our country and who likely destroys it.

What percentage of immigrants, legal or not, do you think are motivated by a desire to destroy our country?

 

 

From the ones that come in illegally,  the vast majority.  They have zero intention of learning the language,  getting a decent job, following our laws, traditions, etc.  They are here only to take handouts from hard working Americans.  No other reason. 

 

 

GOP = jobs

DNC = generational poverty 

 

As it was in the beginning, is now and ever shall be.

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 5:29 pm
👍
2
dbmhoosier
(@dbmhoosier)
Famed Member

Dems think this is good for the country.  Just one reason why you should never listen to anything these freaks say ever again.

https://twitter.com/i/status/2072004800326025248

https://twitter.com/i/status/2070509927345377740

https://twitter.com/i/status/2070272178260439053


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 5:39 pm
Aloha Hoosier's avatar
(@aloha-hoosier)
Famed Member

Posted by: @dbmhoosier

Posted by: @shooter

Posted by: @dbmhoosier

It's about who is likely to improve our country and who likely destroys it.

What percentage of immigrants, legal or not, do you think are motivated by a desire to destroy our country?

 

 

From the ones that come in illegally,  the vast majority.  They have zero intention of learning the language,  getting a decent job, following our laws, traditions, etc.  They are here only to take handouts from hard working Americans.  No other reason. 

 

I’m against illegal immigration for many rational reasons I’ve expressed over the years, but almost every word of your post and your conclusion are absolutely moronic. 

 


This post was modified 3 days ago by Aloha Hoosier
ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 6:01 pm
👍
2
Arthur Dent's avatar
(@arthur-dent)
Noble Member

Posted by: @snarlcakes

Posted by: @arthur-dent

@snarlcakes So eliminating Brown immigration while limiting White isn't any sort of reflection on Brown people?

And why were Chinese blocked 40 years before if there was NO racism? 

Marv, laws limiting non-white immigration were already on the books. And almost all the immigration was coming from white people. If it was because of racism why would the white people pass a new law that cut white immigration by 80%? 

What law blocking immigration of non-Whites existed before 1921? What law other than the Chinese act of 1881 prohibited non-Europeans?

American xenophobia eventually, in 1921, included Europe. That isn't proof xenophobia did not exist, it is proof at how advanced it was. Look at the Know Nothings, they hated Germans, Irish, and Catholics. When the New York anti-Draft riots broke out in the Civil War, it was Irish who were convinced the emancipation would bring Blacks North and the Irish would be even lower in the pecking order. That is how hated the Irish were, they felt they were beneath slaves. 

Xenophobia existed and exists. 

 

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 6:41 pm
👍
1
C Probert's avatar
(@bar-down)
Noble Member

@myteamisonthefloor absolutely and any democrat with descending balls not getting pegged should be profoundly offended by that reality


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 6:46 pm
OneEyedUndertaker
(@oneeyedundertaker)
Noble Member

Posted by: @arthur-dent

Posted by: @snarlcakes

Posted by: @arthur-dent

@snarlcakes So eliminating Brown immigration while limiting White isn't any sort of reflection on Brown people?

And why were Chinese blocked 40 years before if there was NO racism? 

Marv, laws limiting non-white immigration were already on the books. And almost all the immigration was coming from white people. If it was because of racism why would the white people pass a new law that cut white immigration by 80%? 

What law blocking immigration of non-Whites existed before 1921? What law other than the Chinese act of 1881 prohibited non-Europeans?

American xenophobia eventually, in 1921, included Europe. That isn't proof xenophobia did not exist, it is proof at how advanced it was. Look at the Know Nothings, they hated Germans, Irish, and Catholics. When the New York anti-Draft riots broke out in the Civil War, it was Irish who were convinced the emancipation would bring Blacks North and the Irish would be even lower in the pecking order. That is how hated the Irish were, they felt they were beneath slaves. 

Xenophobia existed and exists. 

 

 

I’m sure it was just an oversight that you didn’t answer yet, but were all Asians banned or just Chinese?  Why are you listing countries of origins for Europeans but just races like blacks, browns, & non-whites for all others?  

 


This post was modified 3 days ago by OneEyedUndertaker
ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/30/2026 6:47 pm
Page 15 / 19
Share: