Yeah, we should keep them here so you can have cheaper vegetables and to keep the kiddie porn industry thriving. Children are dispensible, right?
kiddie porn is the best according to your heroes Trump and Gaetz
What will it take for you to care and be disgusted by Biden's border policy?
what will it take for you to be disgusted by MAGAts border policy?
And it's really not a border policy..really just a racist policy of picking up and deporting anyone that isn't white regardless of whether or not they are here illegally. It is all fair game as long as you look like a foreigner.
I need an active IU login.Cost? I’d like to do something like this but don’t want to spend thousands and am not sure where to look/start.I’m taking the IU AI certificate course
@arthur-dent can you manufacture one? Consider this your test run for my heist crew.
@mapletom 🤣 🤣. Your questions beat mine
Can a pit bull beat a coyote with rabies
what side of my body is my heart on
does Alexandra daddario have fake boobs
what does it mean if my right arm is totally numb
if 14 drinks is the max per week does it have to be spread out
So.... are they real?
No.@mapletom 🤣 🤣. Your questions beat mine
Can a pit bull beat a coyote with rabies
what side of my body is my heart on
does Alexandra daddario have fake boobs
what does it mean if my right arm is totally numb
if 14 drinks is the max per week does it have to be spread out
So.... are they real?
Swing and a miss for you. Didn't vote for Trump. Gaetz is a slimeball and I hope he gets charged if he did what is alleged.
I actually googled "sex trafficking during Biden" and the AI Overview was generated.
Edit: just checked that and it didn't give me what I posted. So I can't remember how I got that. Looked at my history and couldn't replicate what I posted. Sorry.
Here the overview for "sex trafficking during Trump first term"
AI Overview
During Donald Trump's first term (2017–2020), his administration prioritized combating sex trafficking through new legislation, executive actions, and funding. Federal prosecution data, however, showed a decline in child sex trafficking cases compared to the previous administration, even as overall anti-trafficking efforts increased.
Trump administration anti-trafficking efforts
The Trump administration framed its initiatives as a whole-of-government approach focused on prosecution, victim protection, and prevention. Actions included:
Executive Orders: An early executive order in February 2017 was aimed at transnational criminal organizations involved in trafficking.
Legislation: President Trump signed multiple bipartisan bills into law, such as the Abolish Human Trafficking Act and the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, which strengthened programs and enhanced prosecution efforts.
Law Enforcement: The administration established the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Center for Countering Human Trafficking (CCHT) and increased funding for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to combat trafficking and support survivors.
Interagency Task Force: The President's Interagency Task Force to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (PITF) continued its work, and nine trafficking survivors were appointed to the U.S. Advisory Council on Human Trafficking.
Funding and Resources: The administration approved a significant DOJ grant package, doubled some anti-trafficking funding, and supported the modernization of the National Human Trafficking Hotline.
Federal prosecution data
Despite the increased federal focus and resources, data from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University showed a downward trend in child sex trafficking prosecutions during this period.
Child sex trafficking prosecutions fell by 35% compared to the Obama administration, reversing a previous upward trend.
The proportion of criminal referrals that resulted in charges also decreased. In fiscal year 2020, prosecutors cited insufficient evidence as the reason for declining two-thirds of child sex trafficking cases.
While prosecutions for this specific crime category fell, data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics shows that convictions for human trafficking offenses overall did increase between 2011 and 2019, before a decline in 2020, which may have been influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Overall landscape
Accurately measuring the true extent of sex trafficking is difficult, as reliable incidence data is limited. The Trafficking in Persons (TIP) Report, published annually by the State Department, showed that global efforts were impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic starting in 2020, which may have masked or altered detection of cases.
What will it take for you to care and be disgusted by Biden's border policy?
what will it take for you to be disgusted by MAGAts border policy?
And it's really not a border policy..really just a racist policy of picking up and deporting anyone that isn't white regardless of whether or not they are here illegally. It is all fair game as long as you look like a foreigner.
Not disgusted at all. Illegal crossings are basically zero. Now maybe we can focus on getting more legal immigrants into the US who having been waiting patiently as we had to stop the line cutters. And we stopped or severely slowed the human trafficking, specifically child sex trafficking.
You said border security. Did you mean deportations and ICE raids? You know we just deported 450+ illegals from South Korea. Are they not white? Google says they are of pale skin color.
Good grief, you are such a partisan that you can't even admit when Biden's policies are wrong and bad for humanity.
HHRG-118-JU01-Wstate-RodasT-20230426.pdf
AI Overview:
Recent New York Times and other investigative reports have highlighted serious concerns about the exploitation, including potential sex trafficking, of unaccompanied migrant children released to sponsors within the United States. The issue has drawn bipartisan condemnation and led to increased oversight of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which is responsible for the children's well-being.
New York Times reporting on migrant child exploitation
Widespread exploitation: A February 2023 New York Times investigation found that hundreds of thousands of unaccompanied minors have come into the country, and that the federal government was unable to track tens of thousands of them. Many of these children ended up in exploitative situations, including dangerous labor conditions, after being placed with sponsors.
Failures to follow up: A follow-up Times report in February 2024 detailed a government review that found HHS failed to safeguard many migrant children by neglecting to make timely follow-up calls to check on the children's welfare. Data showed HHS was unable to reach more than 85,000 children over a two-year period.
Pressure for faster placement: The reporting indicated that Biden administration officials pressured staff to release children from shelters more quickly, allegedly prioritizing speed over safety. One internal memo cited by the Times stated that the HHS Office of Refugee Resettlement had become one "that rewards individuals for making quick releases, and not one that rewards individuals for preventing unsafe releases".
Allegations of sex trafficking
While most reports have focused on child labor, sex trafficking is part of the larger concern surrounding the safety of unaccompanied children.
Increased risk: Congressional testimony from September 2023 highlighted that the increased number of unaccompanied minors at the border puts many children at a high risk of sexual exploitation. An expert noted that the children being sold into "sex slavery" would not agree that the current border policies are humane.
Exploitation by sponsors: The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit in July 2024 against Southwest Key, a large operator of migrant shelters, alleging its employees subjected children to sexual harassment and abuse. This followed a May 2025 DHS report detailing the rescue of a pregnant 14-year-old from a sponsor, and the discovery of three other children who were subject to sexual abuse and potential labor exploitation.
Government acknowledgement: Recent government news releases from the summer of 2025 demonstrate ongoing efforts to combat sex and labor trafficking among migrants, including specific instances of rescuing child victims.
Government response and actions
Investigations and reforms: In early 2025, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice announced actions to end sexual abuse and harassment in migrant child shelters, including halting new placements with certain providers.
Legislative action: Members of Congress have introduced bills aimed at addressing the issue, such as requiring DNA testing to verify family relationships and creating a national database for tracking.
Increased enforcement efforts: The Biden administration has launched initiatives like Joint Task Force Alpha, aimed at disrupting and prosecuting human smuggling and trafficking organizations. The Department of Homeland Security also continues to coordinate efforts to rescue child victims of trafficking.
I'm simply asking you put in some level of work before arrogantly demanding others agree with you. I would say that makes you the partisan, not me.
That was a total clusterfuck that shouldn’t have happened. They were there to set up a factory that will be employing Americans. We have an agreement with South Korea which allows South Koreans expedited entry to our country (and the other way around) on what are essentially a B-1 visas to do this type work. This one is a diplomatic embarrassment that is being cleaned up.You know we just deported 450+ illegals from South Korea.
@aloha-hoosier Never said anything about the validity of the raid. Just pointing out that skin color is not the driving factor as HH stated.
@goat Not sure what you mean. I posted an article and comment that you won't see this anywhere. (And I haven't). My statement was an indictment of the media. I said nothing of Biden's policies.
You decided to reply with a snarky remark. You could have simply acknowledged it was good news and if you had links to prove me wrong in the dissemination of the story, you could have provided those. But you went the snarky path.
So, I provided you with Tara Rodas testimony and and AI overview. I could have provided you a NY Times article as well.
I suppose I could have shared details of Trump’s 4 years but his legacy wasn't about open borders and record illegal crossings. Biden's legacy is about that.
So while I am sure there were some of the 22k from the Trump era, I don’t think it's a stretch to assume the vast majority are from the Biden admin.