Skip to main content

Hoosier Huddle

What changed for De...
 
Notifications
Clear all

What changed for Democrats? TDS?

Page 3 / 3
Goat
 Goat
(@goat)
Famed Member

Posted by: @unclemark
↑

Posted by: @Anonymous
↑

For sure between now and then Dems are going to encourage killing ice agents and national guard persons. 

This is why you will never be taken seriously.

I mean, it's part of a long list.

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 11/30/2025 9:34 pm
😂
👍
3
Unknown's avatar
(@Anonymous)

Posted by: @goat
↑

Posted by: @unclemark
↑

Posted by: @Anonymous
↑

For sure between now and then Dems are going to encourage killing ice agents and national guard persons. 

This is why you will never be taken seriously.

I mean, it's part of a long list.

 

I promised myself not to go after you even when you do it. I hope unclemark is warm in his trailer tonight. 

 


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 11/30/2025 10:44 pm
😂
1
Goat
 Goat
(@goat)
Famed Member

Posted by: @Anonymous
↑

Posted by: @goat
↑

Posted by: @unclemark
↑

Posted by: @Anonymous
↑

For sure between now and then Dems are going to encourage killing ice agents and national guard persons. 

This is why you will never be taken seriously.

I mean, it's part of a long list.

 

I promised myself not to go after you even when you do it. I hope unclemark is warm in his trailer tonight. 

 

No, please. Continue your long tradition of fair and equal rebuttals. I remark that there are reasons no one here takes you seriously, and you respond with repeated attacks on me about how I am a failure at life. That's your usual game plan. Stick with it.

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 11/30/2025 11:50 pm
Unknown's avatar
(@Anonymous)

Posted by: @goat
↑

Posted by: @Anonymous
↑

Posted by: @goat
↑

Posted by: @unclemark
↑

Posted by: @Anonymous
↑

For sure between now and then Dems are going to encourage killing ice agents and national guard persons. 

This is why you will never be taken seriously.

I mean, it's part of a long list.

 

I promised myself not to go after you even when you do it. I hope unclemark is warm in his trailer tonight. 

 

No, please. Continue your long tradition of fair and equal rebuttals. I remark that there are reasons no one here takes you seriously, and you respond with repeated attacks on me about how I am a failure at life. That's your usual game plan. Stick with it.

 

I’ve given like I’ve received in the past. I am sure you disagree. I’ve apologized for going out of bounds. 

This place is dying. 

Good night. 

 

 


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 12/01/2025 12:29 am
UncleMark
(@unclemark)
Illustrious Member

Posted by: @goat
↑

No, please. Continue your long tradition of fair and equal rebuttals. I remark that there are reasons no one here takes you seriously, and you respond with repeated attacks on me about how I am a failure at life. That’s your usual game plan. Stick with it.

If you're so smart, how come you're not rich?


ReplyQuote
Posted : 12/01/2025 10:28 am
Unknown's avatar
(@Anonymous)

Posted by: @unclemark
↑

Posted by: @goat
↑

No, please. Continue your long tradition of fair and equal rebuttals. I remark that there are reasons no one here takes you seriously, and you respond with repeated attacks on me about how I am a failure at life. That’s your usual game plan. Stick with it.

If you're so smart, how come you're not rich?

Keep chirping.  Be careful, the roads might be slick this morning. 

 


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 12/01/2025 10:55 am
Unknown's avatar
(@Anonymous)

Posted by: @goat
↑

Posted by: @Anonymous
↑

Posted by: @goat
↑

Posted by: @unclemark
↑

Posted by: @Anonymous
↑

For sure between now and then Dems are going to encourage killing ice agents and national guard persons. 

This is why you will never be taken seriously.

I mean, it's part of a long list.

 

I promised myself not to go after you even when you do it. I hope unclemark is warm in his trailer tonight. 

 

No, please. Continue your long tradition of fair and equal rebuttals. I remark that there are reasons no one here takes you seriously, and you respond with repeated attacks on me about how I am a failure at life. That's your usual game plan. Stick with it.

 

I am out of here. Account should be deleted this afternoon. I apologize one last time. Good luck. 

 


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 12/01/2025 2:44 pm
👍
1
JDB's avatar
 JDB
(@jdb)
Famed Member

had to:

 

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/RpD_tKmdLeQ


ReplyQuote
Posted : 12/03/2025 12:48 pm
JDB's avatar
 JDB
(@jdb)
Famed Member

https://twitter.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1996290335840866794


ReplyQuote
Posted : 12/04/2025 9:09 am
😂
1
HurryingHoosiers
(@hurryinghoosiers)
Noble Member

Posted by: @jdb
↑

https://twitter.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1996290335840866794

The retort would be more meaningful if she was the one trying to destroy the Dept of Education.  Most people don't care if people send their kids to private schools.  It's the sending taxpayer money to privates schools in the form of vouchers (stealing from public schools) and trying to destroy the dept of education that people have issues with.

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 12/04/2025 9:33 am
OneEyedUndertaker
(@oneeyedundertaker)
Noble Member

Posted by: @hurryinghoosiers
↑

Posted by: @jdb
↑

https://twitter.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1996290335840866794

The retort would be more meaningful if she was the one trying to destroy the Dept of Education.  Most people don't care if people send their kids to private schools.  It's the sending taxpayer money to privates schools in the form of vouchers (stealing from public schools) and trying to destroy the dept of education that people have issues with.


Shouldn’t our taxpayers support every child?  
Why should public schools get money for students they aren’t educating?

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 12/04/2025 9:46 am
JDB's avatar
 JDB
(@jdb)
Famed Member

Posted by: @oneeyedundertaker
↑

Posted by: @hurryinghoosiers
↑

Posted by: @jdb
↑

https://twitter.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1996290335840866794

The retort would be more meaningful if she was the one trying to destroy the Dept of Education.  Most people don't care if people send their kids to private schools.  It's the sending taxpayer money to privates schools in the form of vouchers (stealing from public schools) and trying to destroy the dept of education that people have issues with.


Shouldn’t our taxpayers support every child?  
Why should public schools get money for students they aren’t educating?

 

Meh, I disagree with those who push for school choice on this. You make the choice to send your kid to a private institution, you should be funding that endeavor. Local people have some ability to vote on their property taxes (higher or lower, referendums to fund education, etc.). One of those uses of property taxes is to fund public schools. If you don't want to pay property taxes - then don't own property or move to a low or no cost area and send your kids to private school.

I always laugh when the urban people who send their kids to private school, don't use public transportation, etc. complain about city property taxes (e.g., Cook Co., IL). You can always move. You do have a choice.

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 12/04/2025 12:59 pm
👍
1
OneEyedUndertaker
(@oneeyedundertaker)
Noble Member

@jdb My son goes to public school, but I see it it more as dividing the tax revenue allotted for education up per child.  The money should be for educating children, not just funding the school corp imo.  An extreme  example, but if a new private school opens, & 200 kids leave the public school for the private, should the school still get the same funding, or do you  cut the funding, cut taxes, etc?


ReplyQuote
Posted : 12/04/2025 1:59 pm
JDB's avatar
 JDB
(@jdb)
Famed Member

Posted by: @oneeyedundertaker
↑

@jdb My son goes to public school, but I see it it more as dividing the tax revenue allotted for education up per child.  The money should be for educating children, not just funding the school corp imo.  An extreme  example, but if a new private school opens, & 200 kids leave the public school for the private, should the school still get the same funding, or do you  cut the funding, cut taxes, etc?

It's a fair point and I acknowledge that some federal funding, of which I am not a proponent of, should go to every child assuming it was collected via common revenue sources (e.g., income taxes). 

In your example, I would prefer the government cut funding/taxes vs. start playing an allocation game. We all know that is a difficult political decision though.

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 12/04/2025 6:14 pm
👍
1
Page 3 / 3
Share: