It will be both more than zero and statistically insignificant.What happens? Republicans retain control of both chambers? Dems take the House (by what kind of margin) but not the Senate? Dems take both chambers?
Can you tell me how many non-citizens will be voting first?
none. moron
true. although probably easier to fool people with an ID of a dead trumper (who may not have been properly purged upon death) than for someone that isn't even on the list of eligible voters to begin with.
Neither instance changed any election and all this fearmongering over illegal votes is nothing more than an excuse to enact voter suppression.
It will be both more than zero and statistically insignificant.What happens? Republicans retain control of both chambers? Dems take the House (by what kind of margin) but not the Senate? Dems take both chambers?
Can you tell me how many non-citizens will be voting first?
none. moron
true. although probably easier to fool people with an ID of a dead trumper (who may not have been properly purged upon death) than for someone that isn't even on the list of eligible voters to begin with.
Neither instance changed any election and all this fearmongering over illegal votes is nothing more than an excuse to enact voter suppression.
Why would anyone need an excuse to suppress the voting of non-citizens?
The administration has spent a ton of money and thrown a lot of manpower at trying to find illegal voter fraud. They’ve failed.@oneeyedundertaker Very, very few. This is a known fact.
How many is very, very few?
It will be both more than zero and statistically insignificant.What happens? Republicans retain control of both chambers? Dems take the House (by what kind of margin) but not the Senate? Dems take both chambers?
Can you tell me how many non-citizens will be voting first?
none. moron
true. although probably easier to fool people with an ID of a dead trumper (who may not have been properly purged upon death) than for someone that isn't even on the list of eligible voters to begin with.
Neither instance changed any election and all this fearmongering over illegal votes is nothing more than an excuse to enact voter suppression.
Why would anyone need an excuse to suppress the voting of non-citizens?
Excuse to suppress the vote of actual citizens.
Follow along. Non-citizens aren't voting. this isn't hard.
Trump is taking advantage of the morons who don't understand how elections work.
The administration has spent a ton of money and thrown a lot of manpower at trying to find illegal voter fraud. They’ve failed.@oneeyedundertaker Very, very few. This is a known fact.
How many is very, very few?
A big "swing and a miss" in the first term.
Trump Disbands Commission on Voter Fraud - The New York Times
Report: Trump commission did not find widespread voter fraud | AP News
And he whiffed on 61 of 62 post-election lawsuits following the 2020 presidential election. That's a batting average of .016
Trump's failed efforts to overturn the election by the numbers
Hall of Shame numbers.
A big "swing and a miss" in the first term.
Trump Disbands Commission on Voter Fraud - The New York Times
Report: Trump commission did not find widespread voter fraud | AP News
And he whiffed on 61 of 62 post-election lawsuits following the 2020 presidential election. That's a batting average of .016
Trump's failed efforts to overturn the election by the numbers
Hall of Shame numbers.
All of this has been widely known as undisputed fact for awhile and yet, we still have people on this board who 'just know' people are voting illegally to sway elections.
@ohio-guy we do know they are voting illegally. I don’t believe enough to sway elections. But in a close race it may not take much. I also firmly believe that Dems don’t want ID or anything else and would cheat in a heartbeat to win. I mean duh. They lied nonstop about Biden
@ohio-guy we do know they are voting illegally. I don’t believe enough to sway elections. But in a close race it may not take much. I also firmly believe that Dems don’t want ID or anything else and would cheat in a heartbeat to win. I mean duh. They lied nonstop about Biden
Who is 'they?' I don't believe there has ever been significant illegal voting to sway a national or statewide election. And the party of 'just find me 11,000 votes' isn't exactly as pure as driven snow.
@ohio-guy I firmly believe only morons think any of our national elections have been stolen by election fraud.
@ohio-guy we do know they are voting illegally. I don’t believe enough to sway elections. But in a close race it may not take much. I also firmly believe that Dems don’t want ID or anything else and would cheat in a heartbeat to win. I mean duh. They lied nonstop about Biden
Who is 'they?' I don't believe there has ever been significant illegal voting to sway a national or statewide election. And the party of 'just find me 11,000 votes' isn't exactly as pure as driven snow.
All the more reason to have secure voting practices.
Hope is not optimism, which expects things to turn out well, but something rooted in the conviction that there is good worth working for. - Seamus Heaney, Irish poet and likely Hoosier basketball fan.
POTFB
If the Republicans lose the Senate we have MAGAs, Paxton and Trump to blame. Cornyn would have easily won the Texas Senate race.
Trump received blunt warning in crucial Texas Senate race
@ohio-guy we do know they are voting illegally. I don’t believe enough to sway elections. But in a close race it may not take much. I also firmly believe that Dems don’t want ID or anything else and would cheat in a heartbeat to win. I mean duh. They lied nonstop about Biden
Who is 'they?' I don't believe there has ever been significant illegal voting to sway a national or statewide election. And the party of 'just find me 11,000 votes' isn't exactly as pure as driven snow.
”I don’t believe”, yep, I’m sure that’s true. If both sides are cheating, it’s all the more reason to put preventative measures in place. Dems want to preserve avenues for cheating.
All the more reason to have secure voting practices.
Wouldn't the fact that Trump failed in pressuring Raffensberger prove that we have - or had - secure voting practices?