I linked it.What do people actually get for mileage? I’ve been, also watched the Blue Angels practice. I was with my brother in law, a Navy veteran. He even believes in math over storytelling!Try it. Based on what people actually get for mileage, you have no chance of making it. Also stay out of the museum.@oneeyedundertaker You cannot drive from Indy to Pensacola on a tank of gas. Admit it and STFU.
I have math, you have…opinions I guess? Unless you can show your work. For example:
36*22=792. Lucas Oil Stadium to The Naval Aviation Museum in Pensacola = 734 miles.
That is Indy to Pensacola, no?
Blue Angels are the best of the flight teams.
How is that value calculated?I linked it.What do people actually get for mileage? I’ve been, also watched the Blue Angels practice. I was with my brother in law, a Navy veteran. He even believes in math over storytelling!Try it. Based on what people actually get for mileage, you have no chance of making it. Also stay out of the museum.@oneeyedundertaker You cannot drive from Indy to Pensacola on a tank of gas. Admit it and STFU.
I have math, you have…opinions I guess? Unless you can show your work. For example:
36*22=792. Lucas Oil Stadium to The Naval Aviation Museum in Pensacola = 734 miles.
That is Indy to Pensacola, no?
Blue Angels are the best of the flight teams.
What kind of car do you have that has a 22 gal tank? Most put smaller and smaller tanks as the milage gets better.@oneeyedundertaker You cannot drive from Indy to Pensacola on a tank of gas. Admit it and STFU.
I have math, you have…opinions I guess? Unless you can show your work. For example:
36*22=792. Lucas Oil Stadium to The Naval Aviation Museum in Pensacola = 734 miles.
That is Indy to Pensacola, no?
There are 10 types of people in this world, those who know binary and those who don't.
That was his convoluted way of trying to win an argument. In order to attempt to win an argument he didn't go with standards. The 36 is the size of the tank in his formula and he thinks he could get 22 mpg with a truck with those options. Highly unlikely. 36-gallon tanks are available as an upgrade to F-150 pickup trucks, but the standard is actually 23 gallons with a few models coming with a 26-gallon tank. He also used a higher-than-average mpg than F-150s get in real life.What kind of car do you have that has a 22 gal tank? Most put smaller and smaller tanks as the milage gets better.@oneeyedundertaker You cannot drive from Indy to Pensacola on a tank of gas. Admit it and STFU.
I have math, you have…opinions I guess? Unless you can show your work. For example:
36*22=792. Lucas Oil Stadium to The Naval Aviation Museum in Pensacola = 734 miles.
That is Indy to Pensacola, no?
Using the advertised combined mpg with a 23-gallon tank the math is 23*19=437 or 23*21=483 for a smaller engine. If he had a model with a 26-gallon tank the math is 26*19=494 or 26*21=546. The actual mileage would almost certainly be less, but even using advertised mileage, he's walking part of the trip. If he's driving from Indy in any of those F150s he's not going to make it on a single tank though using his best-case formula it looks like he could. He shouldn't bet money on it.
That was his convoluted way of trying to win an argument. In order to attempt to win an argument he didn't go with standards. The 36 is the size of the tank in his formula and he thinks he could get 22 mpg with a truck with those options. Highly unlikely. 36-gallon tanks are available as an upgrade to F-150 pickup trucks, but the standard is actually 23 gallons with a few models coming with a 26-gallon tank. He also used a higher-than-average mpg than F-150s get in real life.What kind of car do you have that has a 22 gal tank? Most put smaller and smaller tanks as the milage gets better.@oneeyedundertaker You cannot drive from Indy to Pensacola on a tank of gas. Admit it and STFU.
I have math, you have…opinions I guess? Unless you can show your work. For example:
36*22=792. Lucas Oil Stadium to The Naval Aviation Museum in Pensacola = 734 miles.
That is Indy to Pensacola, no?
Using the advertised combined mpg with a 23-gallon tank the math is 23*19=437 or 23*21=483 for a smaller engine. If he had a model with a 26-gallon tank the math is 26*19=494 or 26*21=546. The actual mileage would almost certainly be less, but even using advertised mileage, he's walking part of the trip. If he's driving from Indy in any of those F150s he's not going to make it on a single tank though using his best-case formula it looks like he could. He shouldn't bet money on it.
Why do you keep ignoring the Ford/gov’t certified chart I posted? I deducted 10% from the posted mileage to account for less than ideal conditions, so again you lie saying I chose best case, that’s why I used 22 instead of 24-25. What is the distribution of trucks that have the 23 vs the 36 gallon tanks?
You said it can’t be done. The worst kind of stupid.
Your chart means nothing to me. I Googled for F-150 standards and most F-150s have 23-gallon tanks, some have 26-gallon tanks and 36 is an upgrade you'd have to pay to get - that is obviously best case. As are your mileages, but just to help you out I used what Ford advertised for combined mph for their two gas engine options. I also linked what the data concerning what people actually get for mileage earlier but didn't use that in the above equations. I was trying to help you. All this information is easily found. If you want to claim victory somehow, feel free. I really would like to see you try the trip. You wouldn't make it, but if you'd like to run out of gas trying to prove a point, go for it.That was his convoluted way of trying to win an argument. In order to attempt to win an argument he didn't go with standards. The 36 is the size of the tank in his formula and he thinks he could get 22 mpg with a truck with those options. Highly unlikely. 36-gallon tanks are available as an upgrade to F-150 pickup trucks, but the standard is actually 23 gallons with a few models coming with a 26-gallon tank. He also used a higher-than-average mpg than F-150s get in real life.What kind of car do you have that has a 22 gal tank? Most put smaller and smaller tanks as the milage gets better.@oneeyedundertaker You cannot drive from Indy to Pensacola on a tank of gas. Admit it and STFU.
I have math, you have…opinions I guess? Unless you can show your work. For example:
36*22=792. Lucas Oil Stadium to The Naval Aviation Museum in Pensacola = 734 miles.
That is Indy to Pensacola, no?
Using the advertised combined mpg with a 23-gallon tank the math is 23*19=437 or 23*21=483 for a smaller engine. If he had a model with a 26-gallon tank the math is 26*19=494 or 26*21=546. The actual mileage would almost certainly be less, but even using advertised mileage, he's walking part of the trip. If he's driving from Indy in any of those F150s he's not going to make it on a single tank though using his best-case formula it looks like he could. He shouldn't bet money on it.
Why do you keep ignoring the Ford/gov’t certified chart I posted? I deducted 10% from the posted mileage to account for less than ideal conditions, so again you lie saying I chose best case, that’s why I used 22 instead of 24-25. What is the distribution of trucks that have the 23 vs the 36 gallon tanks?
You said it can’t be done. The worst kind of stupid.
https://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/detroit-auto-show-spotlight-dims-evs-129257180
A good friend will bail you out of jail, but your best friend will be sitting next to you in the cell saying "that was f***ing awesome"