Her husband did this.
With zero context regarding who she is or what she did, I'd say she has potential. That said, I've seen enough dating profiles that you need more than a headshot to make that complete judgement.
of all the many crimes against humanity committed by the legal profession, the most egregious is the affirmative defense of "Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity"
A good friend will bail you out of jail, but your best friend will be sitting next to you in the cell saying "that was f***ing awesome"
Every female lawyer and law clerk in my office was cheering for Clancy, I just discovered. Weird.Mistrial.
Every female lawyer and law clerk in my office was cheering for Clancy, I just discovered. Weird.Mistrial.
Acquittal was probably the correct decision, but not for the reasons those chicks likely think. Massachusetts law is essentially presumed insane until proven sane.
Pics or GTFOEvery female lawyer and law clerk in my office was cheering for Clancy, I just discovered. Weird.Mistrial.
I can send those to you offline.Pics or GTFOEvery female lawyer and law clerk in my office was cheering for Clancy, I just discovered. Weird.Mistrial.
Edith would be a huge Clancy defender.
Not as big as Charlotte Perkins GilmanI can send those to you offline.Pics or GTFOEvery female lawyer and law clerk in my office was cheering for Clancy, I just discovered. Weird.Mistrial.
Edith would be a huge Clancy defender.
Acquittal was probably the correct decision, but not for the reasons those chicks likely think. Massachusetts law is essentially presumed insane until proven sane.
So if I'm understanding correctly, one dude wanted to hang her and the rest bought the insanity defense.
I get requiring a unanimous jury for a guilty verdict, but something seems not right about one person preventing an acquittal.