The question makes little sense. Why would a newspaper care about protecting powerful people? They live to expose scandals. That sells papers. Explain why you'd think they're protecting anyone? They couldn't do it even if they wanted to for some nonsensical reason.You ducked my question, but that's ok.
That could explain why Bezos prevented WaPo from endorsing a candidate for President in 2024 for the first time ever as they were about to endorse Harris (I know, she was awful, but many awful candidates, HRC for example, have been endorsed by papers over the years). This has some speculation like Bezos' friends could be exposed, but it's just by readers:@aloha-hoosier maybe something to do with Bezos
Jeff Bezos’ MAGAfied WaPo Has Bonkers Take on Epstein Files
WaPo will have no say on release of Epstein files. It's all up to DoJ now - and we can only hope they actually do release everything.
Disclaimer for those who've not seen it before or assume it's about Trump for me - I DO NOT think Trump is implicated in any criminal behavior in the files and never have. I've said this several times.
The question makes little sense. Why would a newspaper care about protecting powerful people? They live to expose scandals. That sells papers. Explain why you'd think they're protecting anyone? They couldn't do it even if they wanted to for some nonsensical reason.You ducked my question, but that's ok.
Why has 60 Minutes attacked Trump every Sunday over the last decade? Why don't they ever broadcast something that portrays the Washington Establishment in a less-than-glorious light? You seem to believe that major media outlets don't serve their corporate and government masters and just want to tell the truth.
Why has 60 Minutes attacked Trump every Sunday over the last decade? Why don’t they ever broadcast something that portrays the Washington Establishment in a less-than-glorious light? You seem to believe that major media outlets don’t serve their corporate and government masters and just want to tell the truth.
They're a private company. They're allowed to take any position they want, for any reason they want. Same as Fox.
You must be kidding? 60 Minutes has done tons and tons of government exposes over the years. I'd bet money you don't ever watch it and are merely repeating butt-hurt MAGA nonsense. MAGA is full of conspiracy theorists, so you feel right at home.The question makes little sense. Why would a newspaper care about protecting powerful people? They live to expose scandals. That sells papers. Explain why you'd think they're protecting anyone? They couldn't do it even if they wanted to for some nonsensical reason.You ducked my question, but that's ok.
Why has 60 Minutes attacked Trump every Sunday over the last decade? Why don't they ever broadcast something that portrays the Washington Establishment in a less-than-glorious light? You seem to believe that major media outlets don't serve their corporate and government masters and just want to tell the truth.
Was the 2020 election stolen?
Did the COVID vaccine do more harm than good?
Was the moon landing faked?
If you answered yes on any of those, you can move along. Don't bother ever posting anything to me again.
You must be kidding? 60 Minutes has done tons and tons of government exposes over the years.
No, I'm not kidding. 60 Minutes hasn't broadcast anything in YEARS that risks casting the Washington Establishment in anything less than a glorious light.
A glorious light! LOL! You got it bad.You must be kidding? 60 Minutes has done tons and tons of government exposes over the years.
No, I'm not kidding. 60 Minutes hasn't broadcast anything in YEARS that risks casting the Washington Establishment in anything less than a glorious light.
Answer my questions.
A glorious light! LOL! You got it bad.
Answer my questions.
Nah. When did 60 Minutes broadcast anything in the past five years that was critical of the Washington state?
Hey @aloha-hoosier
Did 60 Minutes edit its interview with Kamala to make her look better?
Paramount settles with Trump for $16m over 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris | Paramount Pictures | The Guardian https://share.google/B2dsEZj8K31SwstO2
You made an assertion which is ridiculously false and that you cannot prove. Move on.
You're the typical disingenuous leftist that ignores truth and hides from inconvenient questions.
I'm not a leftist. Not even close. I'm a non-MAGA long-time conservative who lives in reality. I was arguing with the actual lefties here and all the predecessor Water Coolers long before you were a turd in Trump's golden throne. What is it with insecure MAGAs hiding from the truth? You should be able to answer that one.You made an assertion which is ridiculously false and that you cannot prove. Move on.
You're the typical disingenuous leftist that ignores truth and hides from inconvenient questions.