Skip to main content

Hoosier Huddle

Terrorist-Sympathiz...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Terrorist-Sympathizing Ilhan Omar worth $30 million now

Page 16 / 16
JDB's avatar
 JDB
(@jdb)
Famed Member

Posted by: @hurryinghoosiers
↑

That's because you're a moron

 

I'm not even convinced you are a real person.


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 10/30/2026 3:33 pm
👍
4
C Probert's avatar
(@bar-down)
Famed Member

@aloha-hoosier no I said they do favor the wealthy


ReplyQuote
Posted : 10/30/2026 3:37 pm
👍
1
CO. Hoosier
(@co-hoosier)
Famed Member

Posted by: @aloha-hoosier
↑

Rubio hasn't done so. He would have a chance.

 

You must not have read or listened to Rubio’s Athens speech.  I haven't heard a better example of making America (and the West) great again than that speech.  


ReplyQuote
Posted : 10/30/2026 4:29 pm
JDB's avatar
 JDB
(@jdb)
Famed Member

lol https://twitter.com/nypost/status/2116302097708708146


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 10/31/2026 4:13 am
😂
2
C Probert's avatar
(@bar-down)
Famed Member

@jdb that’s a d/b/a @dbmhoosier are the walls closing in on her???


ReplyQuote
Posted : 10/31/2026 9:10 am
CO. Hoosier
(@co-hoosier)
Famed Member

@aloha-hoosier

Posted by: @aloha-hoosier
↑

You really don't think Trump's policies favor the wealthy? What about the first term tax breaks and the Big Beautiful Bill. If your bitch about traditional Republicans favor the wealthy, you should have the same bitch about Trump and MAGA.

The problem isn’t that Trump favors the wealthy, it’s more about the insatiable obsession Democrats have with equality.  That mostly shows up in economics, but the obsession seeps into social policy as well.  Now along comes Trump and relaxes the egalitarian regs.  Naturally the wealthy will benefit more because of a history of education and achievement.  

So long as we have a functioning safety net, I don’t see much wrong economic inequality. Because economics operates on a quest for equilibrium, putting a government finger on the scale of equilibrium will  adversely affect economic activity.  


ReplyQuote
Posted : 10/31/2026 10:46 am
UncleMark
(@unclemark)
Illustrious Member

Posted by: @co-hoosier
↑

So long as we have a functioning safety net, I don’t see much wrong economic inequality. Because economics operates on a quest for equilibrium, putting a government finger on the scale of equilibrium will  adversely affect economic activity.  

As always, it's a question of degree. Back in the 50s and 60 when C-suite money was some 10x worker money it wasn't a big deal. Now, with 100x or 1000x, it's a whole different story.

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 10/31/2026 2:06 pm
JDB's avatar
 JDB
(@jdb)
Famed Member

https://twitter.com/BarryOnHere/status/2120240172067619015


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 11/10/2026 5:59 pm
UncleMark
(@unclemark)
Illustrious Member

Posted by: @jdb
↑

https://twitter.com/BarryOnHere/status/2120240172067619015

Which of course hands the Raiders over to Fernando.

I'll be watching as much as I can.

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 11/10/2026 6:14 pm
JDB's avatar
 JDB
(@jdb)
Famed Member

Posted by: @unclemark
↑

Posted by: @jdb
↑

https://twitter.com/BarryOnHere/status/2120240172067619015

Which of course hands the Raiders over to Fernando.

I'll be watching as much as I can.

 


Fernando Mendoza GIF

 


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 11/10/2026 6:45 pm
Page 16 / 16
Share: