And this is why you’re an emotion driven dumbass MAGA dipshit. You don’t have a clue. I could walk down the halls of where you work and point at you and others and fire you without knowing what you do or how well you do it, and that would be the same. You might even be doing something important and worthwhile. I’m not betting on it.And this is why you're dumb as shit. Cutting government jobs is always a good thing.
And this is why you’re an emotion driven dumbass MAGA dipshit. You don’t have a clue. I could walk down the halls of where you work and point at you and others and fire you without knowing what you do or how well you do it, and that would be the same. You might even be doing something important and worthwhile. I’m not betting on it.And this is why you're dumb as shit. Cutting government jobs is always a good thing.
Any job that was needed and profitable would happen in the private sector, barring regulations.
Putting that aside the cuts have already happened and the economy is humming along at a 3%+ clip, markets are up double digits, and deficit spending decreased. We've ran the experiment and the cutting of 271,000 federal jobs has been really good for the economy, which isn't surprising at all. A good podcast episode to listen to if you want to be informed.
https://twitter.com/theallinpod/status/2003208641277481346?s=46
None of that is due to the workforce cuts, which weren’t targeted and not permanent. You don’t know what causes what. You just do MAGA emotion stuff.And this is why you’re an emotion driven dumbass MAGA dipshit. You don’t have a clue. I could walk down the halls of where you work and point at you and others and fire you without knowing what you do or how well you do it, and that would be the same. You might even be doing something important and worthwhile. I’m not betting on it.And this is why you're dumb as shit. Cutting government jobs is always a good thing.
Any job that was needed and profitable would happen in the private sector, barring regulations.
Putting that aside the cuts have already happened and the economy is humming along at a 3%+ clip, markets are up double digits, and deficit spending decreased. We've ran the experiment and the cutting of 271,000 federal jobs has been really good for the economy, which isn't surprising at all. A good podcast episode to listen to if you want to be informed.
https://twitter.com/theallinpod/status/2003208641277481346?s=46
Is your job in the private sector? If not, resign. You’re worthless.
None of that is due to the workforce cuts, which weren’t targeted and not permanent. You don’t know what causes what. You just do MAGA emotion stuff.And this is why you’re an emotion driven dumbass MAGA dipshit. You don’t have a clue. I could walk down the halls of where you work and point at you and others and fire you without knowing what you do or how well you do it, and that would be the same. You might even be doing something important and worthwhile. I’m not betting on it.And this is why you're dumb as shit. Cutting government jobs is always a good thing.
Any job that was needed and profitable would happen in the private sector, barring regulations.
Putting that aside the cuts have already happened and the economy is humming along at a 3%+ clip, markets are up double digits, and deficit spending decreased. We've ran the experiment and the cutting of 271,000 federal jobs has been really good for the economy, which isn't surprising at all. A good podcast episode to listen to if you want to be informed.
https://twitter.com/theallinpod/status/2003208641277481346?s=46
Is your job in the private sector? If not, resign. You’re worthless.
As much as I love the energy, worthless is a little much. Public jobs are less efficient and eventually cause economies to collapse if they're too many. It's why it's so important to keep Federal spending and jobs in check.
https://twitter.com/nickjfreitas/status/2003407902497996884?s=61&t=1KiTJ7EYgX-uQgf4Wkb9sg
Graduate of the Ken Burns school of revisionist history…
@oneeyedundertaker This really isn't surprising. She's Ivy League stupid. Don't send your kids to any of these schools today. Remember the leaders who were so mealy-mouthed they couldn't define a woman. Ivy Leaguers are Betas. Good at taking tests. Close the book and there's no one home. I think anyone with any sense knows not all diversity is good diversity. I know enough women like her from my SPEA days. Clueless. At least the education majors knew they were really just majoring in husband exploration. Their problem is that when they grow old their hubs will tell them go back to work. You're a teacher! At least with SPEA you can honestly answer: "and do what?!! Anyway, please make sure you grease my cards today. My pockets are dry. Off to get my nails done!"
More lies from the political class. Shocking.https://twitter.com/nickjfreitas/status/2003407902497996884?s=61&t=1KiTJ7EYgX-uQgf4Wkb9sg
Graduate of the Ken Burns school of revisionist history…
https://twitter.com/kevinnbass/status/2004791623721574821?s=61&t=1KiTJ7EYgX-uQgf4Wkb9sg
Remember kids, voting for Dems is voting to expand this exponentially!
@oneeyedundertaker The fate of our country depends on every election at this point. Honestly. The Dem party with socialism, open borders, defunding crime will destroy our country. That's not hyperbole. That's fact. Imagine if Dems wouldn't have lost the House. Imagine if Dems wouldn't have had Manchin. Imagine if Dems didn't have President Trump. Imagine eight years of open borders. As many as what 40 million? 50 million? All in need of aid. Cultures that don't mesh with ours. Imagine the welfare expansion. Crime. 8 years of Dems and our country would have been unrecognizable. Open air drug markets. Crime. Scary to imagine. Trump is awful but this holiday season be very, very thankful for him. He literally saved America.
@oneeyedundertaker The fate of our country depends on every election at this point. Honestly. The Dem party with socialism, open borders, defunding crime will destroy our country. That's not hyperbole. That's fact. Imagine if Dems wouldn't have lost the House. Imagine if Dems wouldn't have had Manchin. Imagine if Dems didn't have President Trump. Imagine eight years of open borders. As many as what 40 million? 50 million? All in need of aid. Cultures that don't mesh with ours. Imagine the welfare expansion. Crime. 8 years of Dems and our country would have been unrecognizable. Open air drug markets. Crime. Scary to imagine. Trump is awful but this holiday season be very, very thankful for him. He literally saved America.

The fate of our country depends on every election at this point. Honestly. The Dem party with socialism, open borders, defunding crime will destroy our country. That's not hyperbole. That's fact. Imagine if Dems wouldn't have lost the House. Imagine if Dems wouldn't have had Manchin. Imagine if Dems didn't have President Trump. Imagine eight years of open borders. As many as what 40 million? 50 million? All in need of aid. Cultures that don't mesh with ours. Imagine the welfare expansion. Crime. 8 years of Dems and our country would have been unrecognizable. Open air drug markets. Crime. Scary to imagine. Trump is awful but this holiday season be very, very thankful for him. He literally saved America.
What Democrats do is bad enough. But how they think is worse. After trying as hard as I can, and reading as much is I can, I can never understand the logic behind many of their positions on things like the border, criminal justice, vaccine mandates and more. The only common element is an emotionally-driven agenda steeped in depression and anxiety.
Tough to read that post without concluding you are just engaging in one big ad hominem agaisnt an entire party--Dems have depression and anxiety so their policy positions must be wrong.The fate of our country depends on every election at this point. Honestly. The Dem party with socialism, open borders, defunding crime will destroy our country. That's not hyperbole. That's fact. Imagine if Dems wouldn't have lost the House. Imagine if Dems wouldn't have had Manchin. Imagine if Dems didn't have President Trump. Imagine eight years of open borders. As many as what 40 million? 50 million? All in need of aid. Cultures that don't mesh with ours. Imagine the welfare expansion. Crime. 8 years of Dems and our country would have been unrecognizable. Open air drug markets. Crime. Scary to imagine. Trump is awful but this holiday season be very, very thankful for him. He literally saved America.
What Democrats do is bad enough. But how they think is worse. After trying as hard as I can, and reading as much is I can, I can never understand the logic behind many of their positions on things like the border, criminal justice, vaccine mandates and more. The only common element is an emotionally-driven agenda steeped in depression and anxiety.
As for their reasons, of course you can understand it--you just disagree with it.
And as for the implied notion that people with depression and/or anxiety shouldn't be trusted, followed, or listened to:The fate of our country depends on every election at this point. Honestly. The Dem party with socialism, open borders, defunding crime will destroy our country. That's not hyperbole. That's fact. Imagine if Dems wouldn't have lost the House. Imagine if Dems wouldn't have had Manchin. Imagine if Dems didn't have President Trump. Imagine eight years of open borders. As many as what 40 million? 50 million? All in need of aid. Cultures that don't mesh with ours. Imagine the welfare expansion. Crime. 8 years of Dems and our country would have been unrecognizable. Open air drug markets. Crime. Scary to imagine. Trump is awful but this holiday season be very, very thankful for him. He literally saved America.
What Democrats do is bad enough. But how they think is worse. After trying as hard as I can, and reading as much is I can, I can never understand the logic behind many of their positions on things like the border, criminal justice, vaccine mandates and more. The only common element is an emotionally-driven agenda steeped in depression and anxiety.
Mental health conditions have often mistakenly been associated with weakness, and the stigma of being labelled “mentally ill” is sometimes as big a burden as the condition itself. While mental health literacy might be improving, too many of us still believe in dated ideas such as the one that says people with mental health problems can’t hold down a job.
In fact, some of our most iconic leaders suffered from mental health conditions.“Mania enhances creativity and resilience to trauma, while depression increases realism and empathy,” writes Nassir Ghaemi, a professor of psychiatry, who has carried out extensive research on the link between mental illness and leadership.
Ghaemi’s research not only proves that people suffering from a mental health illness can be great leaders – it also suggests they can make better leaders: “When times are good and the ship of state only needs to sail straight, mentally healthy people function well as political leaders. But in times of crisis and tumult, those who are mentally abnormal, even ill, become the greatest leaders.”
As these four inspiring leaders show, it’s time to dispel the myths of the past and stop stigmatizing something that affects one in four people at some point in their lives. We must listen to Ghaemi’s words and recognize that for some people, “their weakness is the secret of their strength”.
Abraham Lincoln
According to letters written by his friends, Lincoln was “the most depressed person they’d ever seen” and it seems from research that depression ran in his family.
But it wasn’t always that way. As a young man, acquaintances remembered him for his sunny disposition: “I never saw Mr Lincoln angry or desponding,” said a fellow soldier in the Black Hawk War, “but always cheerful.” After several personal tragedies – including the death of his sister and a close friend – he started to suffer with bouts of depression. They were sometimes so extreme that friends worried he would take his life: “Lincoln was locked up by his friends … to prevent derangement or suicide,” one villager in New Salem said.
In Lincoln’s Melancholy: How Depression Challenged a President and Fueled His Greatness, Joshua Wolf Shenk shows how the president who led the US through its bloody civil war managed to turn his suffering into strength.

Winston Churchill
Churchill spoke very openly about his depression and went through a particularly severe period in the years before the First World War: “For two or three years, the light faded from the picture. I did my work. I sat in the House of Commons. But a black depression settled on me,” he later told his doctor.
According to a recent biography, the legendary British wartime leader found great comfort in creative activities: “His creative-depressive personality meant that writing (or painting, or bricklaying) was a way of keeping the ‘black dog’ of depression at bay.” As a result, he produced more words than Shakespeare and Dickens combined, and while now famous for his political leadership, he also became one of the highest paid journalists of his time.
But the shadow of depression followed him most of his life: “I don’t like standing near the edge of a platform when an express train is passing through. I like to stand back and, if possible, get a pillar between me and the train. I don’t like to stand by the side of a ship and look down into the water. A second’s action would end everything. A few drops of desperation.”
Martin Luther King Jr
Despite being one of the most widely researched leaders of modern times, very little is ever written about Martin Luther King Jr’s experience with depression. As a 1968 Time Magazine profile of him notes, he twice attempted to commit suicide before the age of 13, following the death of his grandmother.
He suffered several bouts of severe depression, and shortly before he was assassinated, his staff even tried to get him psychiatric treatment, which he turned down. But it was one of the characteristics often found in people who suffer from depression – an extreme form of empathy – that drove the civil rights leader to achieve all he did. Addressing a conference of psychologists in 1967, he dismissed their desire to always “cure” maladjustment: “There are some things concerning which we must always be maladjusted if we are to be people of good will.”



