Anti immigration Japanese candidate wins and stonks are gonna pop
https://twitter.com/DavidInglesTV/status/2020647096261673188
popping because new Japanese govt is willing to take on massive debt not because its fixing Japan’s non-existent immigration problems…
https://twitter.com/jonatanpallesen/status/2034697418134999505?s=46&t=Csl_r88muvNMBV79b5VS-Q
Diversity is our strength @arthur-dent
You’re making a crucial point for the general discussion.The energy supply will always be AI’s limiting factor. The thousandth time AI does something will use the same amount of energy as the first time. And energy is becoming more costly, not less. While we can have AI prepare and serve a cup of coffee, we might never use it that way because of needless energy consumption.
The energy supply will always be AI’s limiting factor. The thousandth time AI does something will use the same amount of energy as the first time. And energy is becoming more costly, not less. While we can have AI prepare and serve a cup of coffee, we might never use it that way because of needless energy consumption.
We are not there, but what you described is not what people are investigating billions in. The goal is for AI to learn. The first time you ask it to do something, it will remember. So the second time it doesn't need to do the same calculation. It has the answer, all it has to do is determine if there is a new reason that answer should change.
As to another point, what exactly does a lawyer do that you think AI could never do? Once AI won at games considered impossible for AI, Jeopardy that uses idioms and other human centric wording, GO, and Diplomacy that requires negotiation and bluff, I don't know what stumbling block there eventually will be. This isn't the Star Trek, "everything I say is a lie, including what I just said" computers.
We aren't there, but there is no reason to think we aren't getting closer. Quantum computing is improving and will be the boost AI needs to get where they want it.
As to another point, what exactly does a lawyer do that you think AI could never do?
Exercise professional judgment. That reward human conciseness. It requires the ability to evaluate and interpret the myriad of factors that make up “ context”.
@oneeyedundertaker better than racism
Country of origin & religion don’t = race, but keep on playing the race card Marv even though it’s a clown move.
https://twitter.com/jonatanpallesen/status/2034697418134999505?s=46&t=Csl_r88muvNMBV79b5VS-Q
Diversity is our strength @arthur-dent
OEU, how did you happen to select the Denmark example?
Is it typical of most countries in respect to crime by immigrants or an outlier?
https://twitter.com/jonatanpallesen/status/2034697418134999505?s=46&t=Csl_r88muvNMBV79b5VS-Q
Diversity is our strength @arthur-dent
OEU, how did you happen to select the Denmark example?
Is it typical of most countries in respect to crime by immigrants or an outlier?
Most comprehensive chart I’ve seen, with a credible looking source. I see no reason Denmark would be an outlier, but I’m listening if you want to make that argument…
https://twitter.com/jonatanpallesen/status/2034697418134999505?s=46&t=Csl_r88muvNMBV79b5VS-Q
Diversity is our strength @arthur-dent
OEU, how did you happen to select the Denmark example?
Is it typical of most countries in respect to crime by immigrants or an outlier?
Most comprehensive chart I’ve seen, with a credible looking source. I see no reason Denmark would be an outlier, but I’m listening if you want to make that argument…
Wow OEU, putting me to work with the Final Four looming.
Will get back to you with an "argument" (aka factual set of facts 🙄 ).
https://twitter.com/jonatanpallesen/status/2034697418134999505?s=46&t=Csl_r88muvNMBV79b5VS-Q
Diversity is our strength @arthur-dent
OEU, how did you happen to select the Denmark example?
Is it typical of most countries in respect to crime by immigrants or an outlier?
Most comprehensive chart I’ve seen, with a credible looking source. I see no reason Denmark would be an outlier, but I’m listening if you want to make that argument…
This study https://share.google/aimode/8oFvAtoPMQO5aWSwA
has the following to say about crime in the U.S. among immigrants...
Immigrants in the U.S. have lower incarceration rates than native-born citizens, with legal immigrants being roughly 75% less likely and undocumented immigrants 44% less likely to be incarcerated. While non-U.S. citizen federal offenders are predominantly from Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador, studies show no correlation between higher immigrant populations and higher crime rates.
As to Denmark the study has this to say...
International Perspective: Research in other countries can differ; for instance, some reports in Denmark showed higher criminality among certain immigrant groups (e.g., non-Western/MENAPT) compared to Danish natives, partly linked to labor market participation.
Two things:
First crime statistics are notoriously unreliable. Some communities and agencies don’t report most property crimes and highly select personal crimes.
Second, I don’t know what one would even study in order to compile reliable data about immigrant crime. Many immigrant criminals are deported with no criminal charges. I do know incarceration rates aren’t relevant at all.