So, a guy who lied about his dad dying to get more time off is suddenly truthful about this?
In Rana’s new filing, one alleged witness — who appears to be a family friend of Rana’s — says he was staying at an apartment while visiting New York City and was woken up by Hajdini’s drunken antics in the middle of the night.
After she returned to the bedroom, he claims, he could hear Rana pleading, “No, no, no, you have to leave. I’m not going to do this. Please stop.”
Yep. Just have his lawyer agree to terms that the settlement would be an undisclosed amount and call it a day. I know a million doesn't go far as most places in the life of an unemployed investment banker living in Manhattan, but it goes far enough. It's not the meal ticket he was hoping for to maintain his current life, but such is life...
BREAKING: The viral JPMorgan ‘sex slave’ lawsuit completely imploded for Chirayu Rana as he was dealt a catastrophic double blow in a Manhattan courtroom just one week after executive Lorna Hajdini hit him with a defamation countersuit. In a last-minute twist hours before a scheduled Tuesday morning hearing, high-profile attorney Daniel Kaiser (known for representing multiple Jeffrey Epstein victims) abruptly filed to be discharged from the case, leaving the disgraced ex-banker entirely without counsel and forced to represent himself pro se moving forward.
The courtroom drama escalated rapidly from there as Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Dakota D. Ramseur permanently stripped Rana of his legal anonymity. Rana’s legal team scrambled to secure a 60-day delay to find new representation and maintain his “John Doe” pseudonym, but the judge flatly denied the request. Defense attorneys for JPMorgan and Hajdini successfully exposed Rana’s media hypocrisy, revealing that while he fought for total privacy in the court docket, he had simultaneously retained a crisis management firm and personally sat for public interviews with media outlets to spin his narrative. As Judge Ramseur stated from the bench, “The case law makes it really clear. You can’t put the genie back in the bottle.”
The ruling marks a massive procedural victory for Hajdini as she seeks to dismantle Rana’s comical sexual abuse allegations. Hajdini’s lawyers argued that keeping Rana anonymous would severely prejudice their ability to clear Hajdini’s name, especially given internal bank documents proving she had no structural oversight over his compensation, alongside separate revelations that Rana had previously faked his own father’s death to secure unearned bereavement leave. With JPMorgan maintaining its hardline stance and flatly refusing to revive its initial pre-suit $1 million settlement offer, Rana must now prepare to walk into the next preliminary hearing on June 23 entirely alone unless he finds another lawyer willing to take up on his claims.
So, a guy who lied about his dad dying to get more time off is suddenly truthful about this?
In Rana’s new filing, one alleged witness — who appears to be a family friend of Rana’s — says he was staying at an apartment while visiting New York City and was woken up by Hajdini’s drunken antics in the middle of the night.
After she returned to the bedroom, he claims, he could hear Rana pleading, “No, no, no, you have to leave. I’m not going to do this. Please stop.”
Has a judge ever said, in open court after hearing a testimony said, "Are you fvckin kidding me"?
If men were any more stupid, we would have breed for the extinction of women. Proof yet again that WE are the best thing they have going for them.
