If you’ve already creamed your jeans on this you wasted a load. All this stuff your Twitter Twits are tweeting (it would be big news and it’s not in news) is nothing more than misrepresenting what was actually reported accurately in December when the DOJ IG report was released. What your Twits are claiming were embedded agents were responding agents.
AI overview:
No FBI agents acted undercover or incited violence during the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot, according to a December 2024 report by the Justice Department Inspector General (OIG)
. However, the report confirmed that 26 FBI confidential human sources (informants) were in Washington, D.C., that day, and several entered restricted areas or the Capitol building itself.
Details from the OIG report:
No agents incited violence: The OIG found no evidence that undercover FBI employees were present in the protest crowds or at the Capitol. The FBI did not authorize any of its informants to break the law, enter the Capitol, or encourage others to do so.
Informants' activities:
Three informants were specifically tasked by the FBI to report on domestic terrorism subjects who might be attending the January 6 events.
One of those three entered the Capitol during the riot, while the other two entered the restricted area around the building.
An additional 23 informants were in Washington on their own initiative. Four of these individuals entered the Capitol, and 11 entered the restricted area.
Response to claims: The OIG report was a direct rebuke to persistent conspiracy theories alleging that the FBI orchestrated the attack. FBI Director Christopher Wray has also publicly called these claims "ludicrous".
Known informants: Some FBI informants have testified during trials related to the Capitol riot, shedding light on their presence with extremist groups like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers.
Response agents: Separately from the OIG's findings on undercover operatives and informants, hundreds of FBI agents and other law enforcement personnel were dispatched to the Capitol as part of the official response after the building was breached. Claims that these responding agents were "embedded" in the crowd have been debunked by fact-checkers. @
This post was modified 8 months ago by Aloha Hoosier
We okay with the white house putting out a list like this?
As violence against and obstruction of ICE reaches a fever pitch. I have no problem highlighting the elected representatives who use rhetoric towards ICE that creates a permission structure for violence.
Even Grok now believes the pipe bomber was a govt asset...
My Best Guess
Based on the totality of evidence—especially the suppressed Air Force lead, cell data ties to federal facilities, timer discrepancies implying day-of placement, and historical FBI patterns in entrapment cases—my best guess is that the bomber was a government asset or affiliate (likely FBI/DOJ-connected, such as an informant or retired military contractor with clearances). This aligns with theories of a staged diversion to justify the riot response or Electoral College certification. It wasn't a random actor or Trump supporter (no ideological links), and the lack of pursuit on solid leads points to protection from within. That said, without a smoking gun (e.g., unredacted cell records or the suspect's interview), it remains speculative. The truth may emerge from Patel's reinvestigations or the $500K reward finally paying out.
I don’t want the White House using official resources on partisan political attacks on the opposing party. You can get that info out there through columnists, talk shows, etc.
My problem with that list of quotes/statements is that a fair number of those things are valid criticisms and not at all over the top. I think you'd be hard-pressed to say just about any of those people are calling for violence against ICE agents.
Even Grok now believes the pipe bomber was a govt asset...
My Best Guess
Based on the totality of evidence—especially the suppressed Air Force lead, cell data ties to federal facilities, timer discrepancies implying day-of placement, and historical FBI patterns in entrapment cases—my best guess is that the bomber was a government asset or affiliate (likely FBI/DOJ-connected, such as an informant or retired military contractor with clearances). This aligns with theories of a staged diversion to justify the riot response or Electoral College certification. It wasn't a random actor or Trump supporter (no ideological links), and the lack of pursuit on solid leads points to protection from within. That said, without a smoking gun (e.g., unredacted cell records or the suspect's interview), it remains speculative. The truth may emerge from Patel's reinvestigations or the $500K reward finally paying out.
Where’s your link? That reads like something made up by one of your MAGA Twitter Twits.
Here’s what Google AI says:
It is unknown who planted the pipe bombs at the Republican National Committee (RNC) and Democratic National Committee (DNC) on January 5, 2021. The FBI is still actively investigating the case and has not identified a suspect. [1, 2, 3, 4]
The devices were placed the night before the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, but their discovery was delayed. The bombs did not detonate, but law enforcement considers them to have been viable. [4, 5, 6]
The ongoing investigation
No arrests made: Despite a lengthy and extensive investigation, no person has been charged or arrested in the case.
Public appeals: The FBI continues to seek the public's help in identifying the bomber and has offered a reward of $500,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction.
Surveillance footage: In January 2025, the FBI released new surveillance video and information about the suspect, hoping to generate new leads. Footage shows a person wearing a mask, a hoodie, dark pants, and distinctive Nike Air Max Speed Turf shoes.
Suspect profile: Authorities estimate the suspect is approximately 5 feet 7 inches tall, but they are still unsure of the person's gender. [3, 5, 7, 8, 9]
Theories and speculation
Because no one has been arrested, the mystery surrounding the pipe bomber has fueled various unproven theories and speculation. The following details from the investigation are often cited, but the FBI has not made a conclusive determination:
Early persons of interest: Congressional investigators revealed that early in the probe, the FBI looked into several people who had suspicious online activity or movements, but those leads were dead ends.
Timing and motive: Given the timing, the act is presumed by many to be related to the January 6 Capitol riot, but the bomber's specific motive is unknown. [8, 11, 12]
Investigative challenges
The FBI has noted several factors that have made the investigation challenging:
The suspect was heavily disguised by a mask and hood, common attire during the pandemic.
The bombs were discovered approximately 15 hours after being placed, potentially reducing witnesses and available evidence.
Much of the initial surveillance footage was of poor quality. [13, 14, 15, 16, 17]
They better hope she's the one because if not, she could be a very wealthy person in the future.
The ran it by a 3 letter agency first and they agreed with them.
The FBI and CIA were covering it up the whole time. She now works for the CIA. Was promoted a few months after J6 and now you know what she had to do to get the promotion.
