Hoosier Huddle

Notifications
Clear all

60 Minutes

Page 8 / 8
Twenty's avatar
(@twenty)
Reputable Member

Scott did an amazing piece a short time ago on a Vietnam cave. 

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/05/2026 2:49 pm
🔥
1
CO. Hoosier
(@co-hoosier)
Noble Member

@hurryinghoosiers 

Dont agree. Most biases are very subtle to the point you don’t consider them biases. 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/05/2026 4:21 pm
UncleMark
(@unclemark)
Famed Member

Posted by: @jdb

But I want details. If you are going to make claims like this, let's be specific. Exposing people for pushing false information is healthy. Call out specifics.

I have no doubt we will hear them eventually. Pelley's probably already got his book advance.


This post was modified 4 days ago by UncleMark
ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 06/05/2026 4:40 pm
👍
1
hooky
(@hooky)
Famed Member

Posted by: @unclemark

Posted by: @jdb

But I want details. If you are going to make claims like this, let's be specific. Exposing people for pushing false information is healthy. Call out specifics.

I have do doubt we will hear them eventually. Pelley's probably already got his book advance.

I kind of wonder if that's why he went full scorched earth in that meeting.

 


Hope is not optimism, which expects things to turn out well, but something rooted in the conviction that there is good worth working for. - Seamus Heaney, Irish poet and likely Hoosier basketball fan.
POTFB

ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/05/2026 4:59 pm
👍
1
sig
 sig
(@sig)
Estimable Member

I doubt that Rogan couldn't out do Pelley if he wanted.  Rogan doesn't do news but if he did,  he'd be really good at it as he is at other stuff he does.   Rogan is highly intelligent and has a variety of guests on his show across so many different topics and he is pretty knowledgable on the topics across the baord. .  Imagine what he could do if concentrated on one thing for a full week and did a real deep dive.   During the show they pull up facts and discuss. He even had Bari Weiss on his show and what a no talent fool she is.   Give her credit for her success.  Really gotta wonder how one can be so successful when they possess such idiocy.  She is firmly in the Israel first group.  

Trump kind of stabbed the America First folks in the back.  So why is his followers still referred to as MAGA?  He is Israel first and Netanyahu's bit....  I call them MIGA but that is one of my favorite breakfast plates or breakfast taco.  

 


This post was modified 4 days ago by sig
ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/05/2026 5:06 pm
CarRamRod's avatar
(@carramrod)
Noble Member

Posted by: @shooter

Posted by: @carramrod

As to subjects choosing their own interviewer. Again. Specifics where are they?

Are you expecting a 100 page legal brief? He gave a simple explanation about why he was fired.

Answer me this, say it's the 1980s and 60 Minutes wants to interview Ronald Reagan.  He says there's no way I'm talking to Dan Rather, Morley Safer, or Ed Bradley.  I will talk to [random other person] though.

Do you think 1980s 60 Minutes management says "That's fine!" or says "pound sand!"????

 

 

That’s not an explanation for why he was fired. It’s a weak explanation for why he disagreed with the new producers and editors. 

The new producer tried to reach out to him, have lunch with him, find a way to work together. 

Pelley chose to be a Martyr. Attack his boss in staff meetings and publicly.

Like Mark said maybe we’ll get details eventually. Who got to choose their own interviewer exactly? What was the editorial feedback on his pieces that got his panties in a twist.

The most sanctimonious man in television doesn’t get the benefit of the doubt when his judgement is questioned.

 

 


This post was modified 4 days ago 2 times by CarRamRod
ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/05/2026 5:46 pm
Aloha Hoosier's avatar
(@aloha-hoosier)
Famed Member
CarRamRod's avatar
(@carramrod)
Noble Member

Opening piece on 60 minutes this week is about how Trumps rhetoric puts federal judges at physical risk. 

The idea this network is somehow in the tank for Trump is absurd. 

Those saying as much should be embarrassed. 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/07/2026 7:24 pm
UncleMark
(@unclemark)
Famed Member

Posted by: @carramrod

Opening piece on 60 minutes this week is about how Trumps rhetoric puts federal judges at physical risk. 

The idea this network is somehow in the tank for Trump is absurd. 

It's a legitimate concern. These judges are being harrassed and threatened and SWATTed. This ain't seashells. 

And no one has claimed they're in the tank for Trump, so you can dispense with that nonsense. At least make up something that makes sense. 

 


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 06/07/2026 7:57 pm
CarRamRod's avatar
(@carramrod)
Noble Member

Posted by: @unclemark

Posted by: @carramrod

Opening piece on 60 minutes this week is about how Trumps rhetoric puts federal judges at physical risk. 

The idea this network is somehow in the tank for Trump is absurd. 

It's a legitimate concern. These judges are being harrassed and threatened and SWATTed. This ain't seashells. 

And no one has claimed they're in the tank for Trump, so you can dispense with that nonsense. At least make up something that makes sense. 

 

 

You had left leaning posters in this thread refer to it as “state tv”, you yourself said Weiss “wants Trump to be sen in a positive light”.

Thats just halfway down page 1 of this thread. 

If you’re going to be dishonest and deny posting like a hysterical bitch don’t make it so obvious. 

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/07/2026 8:02 pm
UncleMark
(@unclemark)
Famed Member

Posted by: @carramrod

Posted by: @unclemark

Posted by: @carramrod

Opening piece on 60 minutes this week is about how Trumps rhetoric puts federal judges at physical risk. 

The idea this network is somehow in the tank for Trump is absurd. 

It's a legitimate concern. These judges are being harrassed and threatened and SWATTed. This ain't seashells. 

And no one has claimed they're in the tank for Trump, so you can dispense with that nonsense. At least make up something that makes sense. 

You had left leaning posters in this thread refer to it as “state tv”, you yourself said Weiss “wants Trump to be sen in a positive light”.

Thats just halfway down page 1 of this thread. 

If you’re going to be dishonest and deny posting like a hysterical bitch don’t make it so obvious. 

Man, you're really grasping at straws.

I'll give you that my comment should have read “wants Trump to be seen in a [more] positive light."

Feel better?

 


ReplyQuote
Topic starter Posted : 06/07/2026 8:33 pm
CarRamRod's avatar
(@carramrod)
Noble Member

Posted by: @unclemark

Posted by: @carramrod

Posted by: @unclemark

Posted by: @carramrod

Opening piece on 60 minutes this week is about how Trumps rhetoric puts federal judges at physical risk. 

The idea this network is somehow in the tank for Trump is absurd. 

It's a legitimate concern. These judges are being harrassed and threatened and SWATTed. This ain't seashells. 

And no one has claimed they're in the tank for Trump, so you can dispense with that nonsense. At least make up something that makes sense. 

You had left leaning posters in this thread refer to it as “state tv”, you yourself said Weiss “wants Trump to be sen in a positive light”.

Thats just halfway down page 1 of this thread. 

If you’re going to be dishonest and deny posting like a hysterical bitch don’t make it so obvious. 

Man, you're really grasping at straws.

I'll give you that my comment should have read “wants Trump to be seen in a [more] positive light."

Feel better?

 

 

What is this thread? Who started it? Why did they share ridiculous links in the original post calling 60 minutes “MAGA”?

 

If you don’t want to be associated with trash opinions, stop going around sharing trash opinions. 

And more infuriatingly, stop acting like a victim when your bullshit is called out.

 

 


ReplyQuote
Posted : 06/07/2026 8:45 pm
😂
👍
2
Page 8 / 8
Share: