Regardless of whether may would have come here or not the Mullins fiasco is inexcusable and should have been a fire able offense on the spot. The fact they had to force Woodson to go watch him in playoff game finally boggles the mind. It was likely too late at that point it was already the end of the season. Not only that Woodson brought his wife with it must have been date night and they needed to match a quick Mullins appearance before dinner and drinks. The below is such a lie he did not heavily recruit him at all.
Indiana basketball coach Mike Woodson and his staff, including assistants Brian Walsh and Jordan Hulls, heavily recruited 2025 shooting guard Braylon Mullins, watching him perform in person multiple times in early 2024. Woodson visited the elite in-state shooter at Greenfield-Central High School, including after a 51-point game.
Pat Forde hits the nail on the head. Maybe this Final Four will be the wake up call IU needs to pull its head out of its ass.
https://twitter.com/bypatforde/status/2040919123895468331?s=61&t=xkRfLUMvPwUi0k01vtU1-w
Regardless of whether may would have come here or not the Mullins fiasco is inexcusable and should have been a fire able offense on the spot. The fact they had to force Woodson to go watch him in playoff game finally boggles the mind. It was likely too late at that point it was already the end of the season. Not only that Woodson brought his wife with it must have been date night and they needed to match a quick Mullins appearance before dinner and drinks. The below is such a lie he did not heavily recruit him at all.
Indiana basketball coach Mike Woodson and his staff, including assistants Brian Walsh and Jordan Hulls, heavily recruited 2025 shooting guard Braylon Mullins, watching him perform in person multiple times in early 2024. Woodson visited the elite in-state shooter at Greenfield-Central High School, including after a 51-point game.
Who here is defending Woodson? Why is this still a topic? Woodson wanted to pay for recruits, not recruit them. He failed at putting together a team that could perform at the levels expected of IU and he was fired. There's no reason to believe Mullins would have come here if he had been heavily recruited by us. There's no reason to believe Woodson would have used him in a fashion that would have made us successful if he had recruited him and gotten him and kept his job. There's no reason to believe that if Woodson had secured a commitment, yet still been fired, that Mullins would have maintained his commitment.
no there isn't but that works both ways. Maybe he would have maybe he wouldn't have. But isn't that what a forum is about. Especially the thread that's titled "Airing of IUBB grievances". Lots of conjecture in sports talk ... ESPN built an empire on it
the Indy Star is telling you guys to move on
Not something IU fans do very easily. We still see posts about "what could've been" with/without: Henderson's knee, Lawrence Funderburke, Eric Montross... heck, even Clyde Lovelette and Oscar!
Given recent history, this is a particularly painful NC game with Dusty and Braylon here. Maybe I'll go back and watch Rose Bowl highlights to take my mind off things!
Pat Forde hits the nail on the head. Maybe this Final Four will be the wake up call IU needs to pull its head out of its ass.
https://twitter.com/bypatforde/status/2040919123895468331?s=61&t=xkRfLUMvPwUi0k01vtU1-w
That is a big big big maybe they have had 25 years to figure it out and have not figured anything out. The hiring of Woodson shows just how clueless they are.
Regardless of whether may would have come here or not the Mullins fiasco is inexcusable and should have been a fire able offense on the spot. The fact they had to force Woodson to go watch him in playoff game finally boggles the mind. It was likely too late at that point it was already the end of the season. Not only that Woodson brought his wife with it must have been date night and they needed to match a quick Mullins appearance before dinner and drinks. The below is such a lie he did not heavily recruit him at all.
Indiana basketball coach Mike Woodson and his staff, including assistants Brian Walsh and Jordan Hulls, heavily recruited 2025 shooting guard Braylon Mullins, watching him perform in person multiple times in early 2024. Woodson visited the elite in-state shooter at Greenfield-Central High School, including after a 51-point game.
Who here is defending Woodson? Why is this still a topic? Woodson wanted to pay for recruits, not recruit them. He failed at putting together a team that could perform at the levels expected of IU and he was fired. There's no reason to believe Mullins would have come here if he had been heavily recruited by us. There's no reason to believe Woodson would have used him in a fashion that would have made us successful if he had recruited him and gotten him and kept his job. There's no reason to believe that if Woodson had secured a commitment, yet still been fired, that Mullins would have maintained his commitment.
Why is this still a topic? - I thought this board was called the airing of grievances are we not allowed to talk about woodson anymore? What are we allowed to air grievances on if you tell me what and what is not allowed I will stay on the approved only topics.
No, you won't.Regardless of whether may would have come here or not the Mullins fiasco is inexcusable and should have been a fire able offense on the spot. The fact they had to force Woodson to go watch him in playoff game finally boggles the mind. It was likely too late at that point it was already the end of the season. Not only that Woodson brought his wife with it must have been date night and they needed to match a quick Mullins appearance before dinner and drinks. The below is such a lie he did not heavily recruit him at all.
Indiana basketball coach Mike Woodson and his staff, including assistants Brian Walsh and Jordan Hulls, heavily recruited 2025 shooting guard Braylon Mullins, watching him perform in person multiple times in early 2024. Woodson visited the elite in-state shooter at Greenfield-Central High School, including after a 51-point game.
Who here is defending Woodson? Why is this still a topic? Woodson wanted to pay for recruits, not recruit them. He failed at putting together a team that could perform at the levels expected of IU and he was fired. There's no reason to believe Mullins would have come here if he had been heavily recruited by us. There's no reason to believe Woodson would have used him in a fashion that would have made us successful if he had recruited him and gotten him and kept his job. There's no reason to believe that if Woodson had secured a commitment, yet still been fired, that Mullins would have maintained his commitment.
Why is this still a topic? - I thought this board was called the airing of grievances are we not allowed to talk about woodson anymore? What are we allowed to air grievances on if you tell me what and what is not allowed I will stay on the approved only topics.
Regardless of whether may would have come here or not the Mullins fiasco is inexcusable and should have been a fire able offense on the spot. The fact they had to force Woodson to go watch him in playoff game finally boggles the mind. It was likely too late at that point it was already the end of the season. Not only that Woodson brought his wife with it must have been date night and they needed to match a quick Mullins appearance before dinner and drinks. The below is such a lie he did not heavily recruit him at all.
Indiana basketball coach Mike Woodson and his staff, including assistants Brian Walsh and Jordan Hulls, heavily recruited 2025 shooting guard Braylon Mullins, watching him perform in person multiple times in early 2024. Woodson visited the elite in-state shooter at Greenfield-Central High School, including after a 51-point game.
Who here is defending Woodson? Why is this still a topic? Woodson wanted to pay for recruits, not recruit them. He failed at putting together a team that could perform at the levels expected of IU and he was fired. There's no reason to believe Mullins would have come here if he had been heavily recruited by us. There's no reason to believe Woodson would have used him in a fashion that would have made us successful if he had recruited him and gotten him and kept his job. There's no reason to believe that if Woodson had secured a commitment, yet still been fired, that Mullins would have maintained his commitment.
Why is this still a topic? - I thought this board was called the airing of grievances are we not allowed to talk about woodson anymore? What are we allowed to air grievances on if you tell me what and what is not allowed I will stay on the approved only topics.
this thread is for exactly what you're posting about ... they've relegated us to one thread only and now they want to censor that ... sounds about right. Don't like an opposing view censor it.
Regardless of whether may would have come here or not the Mullins fiasco is inexcusable and should have been a fire able offense on the spot. The fact they had to force Woodson to go watch him in playoff game finally boggles the mind. It was likely too late at that point it was already the end of the season. Not only that Woodson brought his wife with it must have been date night and they needed to match a quick Mullins appearance before dinner and drinks. The below is such a lie he did not heavily recruit him at all.
Indiana basketball coach Mike Woodson and his staff, including assistants Brian Walsh and Jordan Hulls, heavily recruited 2025 shooting guard Braylon Mullins, watching him perform in person multiple times in early 2024. Woodson visited the elite in-state shooter at Greenfield-Central High School, including after a 51-point game.
Who here is defending Woodson? Why is this still a topic? Woodson wanted to pay for recruits, not recruit them. He failed at putting together a team that could perform at the levels expected of IU and he was fired. There's no reason to believe Mullins would have come here if he had been heavily recruited by us. There's no reason to believe Woodson would have used him in a fashion that would have made us successful if he had recruited him and gotten him and kept his job. There's no reason to believe that if Woodson had secured a commitment, yet still been fired, that Mullins would have maintained his commitment.
Why is this still a topic? - I thought this board was called the airing of grievances are we not allowed to talk about woodson anymore? What are we allowed to air grievances on if you tell me what and what is not allowed I will stay on the approved only topics.
this thread is for exactly what you're posting about ... they've relegated us to one thread only and now they want to censor that ... sounds about right. Don't like an opposing view censor it.
The complete and utter incompetence of Quinn and IU is on full display tonight at 8pm for the whole country to see but we are just supposed to ignore it and move on I guess. Pretend like it never happened. Just watch Mullins make a last second three to win it all.
Regardless of whether may would have come here or not the Mullins fiasco is inexcusable and should have been a fire able offense on the spot. The fact they had to force Woodson to go watch him in playoff game finally boggles the mind. It was likely too late at that point it was already the end of the season. Not only that Woodson brought his wife with it must have been date night and they needed to match a quick Mullins appearance before dinner and drinks. The below is such a lie he did not heavily recruit him at all.
Indiana basketball coach Mike Woodson and his staff, including assistants Brian Walsh and Jordan Hulls, heavily recruited 2025 shooting guard Braylon Mullins, watching him perform in person multiple times in early 2024. Woodson visited the elite in-state shooter at Greenfield-Central High School, including after a 51-point game.
Who here is defending Woodson? Why is this still a topic? Woodson wanted to pay for recruits, not recruit them. He failed at putting together a team that could perform at the levels expected of IU and he was fired. There's no reason to believe Mullins would have come here if he had been heavily recruited by us. There's no reason to believe Woodson would have used him in a fashion that would have made us successful if he had recruited him and gotten him and kept his job. There's no reason to believe that if Woodson had secured a commitment, yet still been fired, that Mullins would have maintained his commitment.
Why is this still a topic? - I thought this board was called the airing of grievances are we not allowed to talk about woodson anymore? What are we allowed to air grievances on if you tell me what and what is not allowed I will stay on the approved only topics.
this thread is for exactly what you're posting about ... they've relegated us to one thread only and now they want to censor that ... sounds about right. Don't like an opposing view censor it.
The complete and utter incompetence of Quinn and IU is on full display tonight at 8pm for the whole country to see but we are just supposed to ignore it and move on I guess. Pretend like it never happened. Just watch Mullins make a last second three to win it all.
the reason it's still a topic and many still wallow in it is because it still hasn't been addressed with a solution or complete recognition of the idiocy of the last 26 years. Win and it goes away... don't see that happening next year either
@hoosiers94 who is censoring anything?
read the thread. Not u.
And as if we need this nonsense from LealDeal on here. You can disagree and think we are out there but no need for this child like behavior.
Surprised that UNC didn't learn from our colossal mistake.