@big-ryan The biggest flaw is not just what he's saying, but how he delivers it. Wild and embarrassing.
I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
I took no offense. I know I'm right. Brad is a douche.
I wish you posted more often. Your content is always worth reading.
He's not a mod anymore... his pull is gone.
You can tell him how you really feel.
I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
I took no offense. I know I'm right. Brad is a douche.
I wish you posted more often. Your content is always worth reading.
He's not a mod anymore... his pull is gone.
You can tell him how you really feel.
He seems like an informed, reasonable person and he doesn't launch attacks against other posters. That's good enough for me.
I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
I took no offense. I know I'm right. Brad is a douche.
I wish you posted more often. Your content is always worth reading.
He's not a mod anymore... his pull is gone.
You can tell him how you really feel.
He seems like an informed, reasonable person and he doesn't launch attacks against other posters. That's good enough for me.
Yeah, if everyone posted like me this place would be... boring as hell.
I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
I took no offense. I know I'm right. Brad is a douche.
I wish you posted more often. Your content is always worth reading.
He's not a mod anymore... his pull is gone.
You can tell him how you really feel.
He seems like an informed, reasonable person and he doesn't launch attacks against other posters. That's good enough for me.
Yeah, if everyone posted like me this place would be... boring as hell.
Don't put yourself down. There's something to be said for civility and reasoned argumentation. But, yes, we're in a world of "citizen journalists" on social media with hyperbolic (and often inaccurate) "BREAKING!" headlines, "Real Housewives" screaming obscenities at each other, and the President of the United States threatening hell on earth in profanity-laced posts. And the leader sets the tone.
How far we have fallen as a society. Sad.
I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
I took no offense. I know I'm right. Brad is a douche.
I wish you posted more often. Your content is always worth reading.
He's not a mod anymore... his pull is gone.
You can tell him how you really feel.
He seems like an informed, reasonable person and he doesn't launch attacks against other posters. That's good enough for me.
Yeah, if everyone posted like me this place would be... boring as hell.
For the sake of all that is holy, if you do have any pull at all left then do whatever it takes to bring back our former resident fixer/exterminator.
I reckon a 4 figure NIL deal with a company Mazda Miata, all you can eat crab legs and a "SBX for life" card would get it done.
Proggy shitlibbery run amok since he's been gone.
A good friend will bail you out of jail, but your best friend will be sitting next to you in the cell saying "that was f***ing awesome"
I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
I took no offense. I know I'm right. Brad is a douche.
I wish you posted more often. Your content is always worth reading.
He's not a mod anymore... his pull is gone.
You can tell him how you really feel.
He seems like an informed, reasonable person and he doesn't launch attacks against other posters. That's good enough for me.
Yeah, if everyone posted like me this place would be... boring as hell.
For the sake of all that is holy, if you do have any pull at all left then do whatever it takes to bring back our former resident fixer/exterminator.
I reckon a 4 figure NIL deal with a company Mazda Miata, all you can eat crab legs and a "SBX for life" card would get it done.
Proggy shitlibbery run amok since he's been gone.
I have it good authority that Cray would do it for half that price.
Think that’s the second or third time I’ve asked about your rivals name. And you continue to refuse to provide it. Pretty telling.Many people, particularly on the emotional side, need to post emotional rants every day about their topic of hate. And then claim they are Christians.I don't know what that last sentence means.Or, unlike you, I like to know what I’m talking about.@twenty He likes to read the room before wading in.
“Christian” Bowlmania at it again.
Not sure what I said to set you off. Many people, particularly those on the timid side, like to read the room before offering an opinion.
What was your screen name at Rivals?
I know Rivals as a sports recruiting site and I've checked it out more than a few times in the past. I don't believe I've ever had an account there though and, in any event, I don't see how that's relevant.
You seem to be coming on very strong here with the Christian references. Yes, I'm Christian as I'm sure most people here are. I don't talk about that very much, though, and I never proselytize here, as some do. I did mention that I'm a Christian in the thread I started about the shift among a number of people in this administration, in public statements, from "God" to "Christ" or "Jesus." In the same thread, I discussed a specific recent incident involving Hegseth. I thought it was important to disclose my religion so I wouldn't be accused of having some "anti-Christian" agenda.
You seem to be challenging my faith in this discussion, with a not-so-veiled reference to me as someone who "claims" to be a Christian. I guess you think I'm some massive hypocrite or "faux" Christian. I'd like to know why you believe that. I'd also like you to point out some of my daily "emotional rants" and "topics of hate." Wow, pretty strong language, but not based in fact. Seems like a stretch perhaps, but do you have me confused with RamRod?
I don't agree with it, but I accept your atheism without judgment. Perhaps you could do the same with respect to my Christianity.
Unlike you, I have a history of attempting to maintain good relations on here with people on both sides of the political aisle. Sometimes I fuck up. But you’ve been a prick since you arrived, in the same manner as Bowl.
Whoever you are, I’m sick of your passive aggressive personal shots. If you’re going to take one, don’t cry when I return the favor.
That's pretty funny. You falsely accuse me of "emotional rants" and then proceed with an emotional rant.
No, I'm not a "prick." I treat people respectfully, except for two or three who lack self-control and civility. You seem to be moving into that territory.
I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
Tell you what. Don't reply to my posts and I won't reply to yours. Deal?
Huh. I thought I was timid? But its good to know you're following my posts with such interest.
Your problem isn't in replying, it's in taking potshots and then coyly hiding behind "oh did that offend you?" reasoning, feigning outrage at someone who gives it back to you.
Think that’s the second or third time I’ve asked about your rivals name. And you continue to refuse to provide it. Pretty telling.Many people, particularly on the emotional side, need to post emotional rants every day about their topic of hate. And then claim they are Christians.I don't know what that last sentence means.Or, unlike you, I like to know what I’m talking about.@twenty He likes to read the room before wading in.
“Christian” Bowlmania at it again.
Not sure what I said to set you off. Many people, particularly those on the timid side, like to read the room before offering an opinion.
What was your screen name at Rivals?
I know Rivals as a sports recruiting site and I've checked it out more than a few times in the past. I don't believe I've ever had an account there though and, in any event, I don't see how that's relevant.
You seem to be coming on very strong here with the Christian references. Yes, I'm Christian as I'm sure most people here are. I don't talk about that very much, though, and I never proselytize here, as some do. I did mention that I'm a Christian in the thread I started about the shift among a number of people in this administration, in public statements, from "God" to "Christ" or "Jesus." In the same thread, I discussed a specific recent incident involving Hegseth. I thought it was important to disclose my religion so I wouldn't be accused of having some "anti-Christian" agenda.
You seem to be challenging my faith in this discussion, with a not-so-veiled reference to me as someone who "claims" to be a Christian. I guess you think I'm some massive hypocrite or "faux" Christian. I'd like to know why you believe that. I'd also like you to point out some of my daily "emotional rants" and "topics of hate." Wow, pretty strong language, but not based in fact. Seems like a stretch perhaps, but do you have me confused with RamRod?
I don't agree with it, but I accept your atheism without judgment. Perhaps you could do the same with respect to my Christianity.
Unlike you, I have a history of attempting to maintain good relations on here with people on both sides of the political aisle. Sometimes I fuck up. But you’ve been a prick since you arrived, in the same manner as Bowl.
Whoever you are, I’m sick of your passive aggressive personal shots. If you’re going to take one, don’t cry when I return the favor.
That's pretty funny. You falsely accuse me of "emotional rants" and then proceed with an emotional rant.
No, I'm not a "prick." I treat people respectfully, except for two or three who lack self-control and civility. You seem to be moving into that territory.
I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
Tell you what. Don't reply to my posts and I won't reply to yours. Deal?
Huh. I thought I was timid? But its good to know you're following my posts with such interest.
Your problem isn't in replying, it's in taking potshots and then coyly hiding behind "oh did that offend you?" reasoning, feigning outrage at someone who gives it back to you.
Tell you what. Don't reply to my posts and I won't reply to yours. Deal?
I thought I was clear, but let me try again: your replies don't concern me. You've been coming at me since you arrived (probably why you want to keep your Rivals username secret), and I only react in this way when you make it personal.Think that’s the second or third time I’ve asked about your rivals name. And you continue to refuse to provide it. Pretty telling.Many people, particularly on the emotional side, need to post emotional rants every day about their topic of hate. And then claim they are Christians.I don't know what that last sentence means.Or, unlike you, I like to know what I’m talking about.@twenty He likes to read the room before wading in.
“Christian” Bowlmania at it again.
Not sure what I said to set you off. Many people, particularly those on the timid side, like to read the room before offering an opinion.
What was your screen name at Rivals?
I know Rivals as a sports recruiting site and I've checked it out more than a few times in the past. I don't believe I've ever had an account there though and, in any event, I don't see how that's relevant.
You seem to be coming on very strong here with the Christian references. Yes, I'm Christian as I'm sure most people here are. I don't talk about that very much, though, and I never proselytize here, as some do. I did mention that I'm a Christian in the thread I started about the shift among a number of people in this administration, in public statements, from "God" to "Christ" or "Jesus." In the same thread, I discussed a specific recent incident involving Hegseth. I thought it was important to disclose my religion so I wouldn't be accused of having some "anti-Christian" agenda.
You seem to be challenging my faith in this discussion, with a not-so-veiled reference to me as someone who "claims" to be a Christian. I guess you think I'm some massive hypocrite or "faux" Christian. I'd like to know why you believe that. I'd also like you to point out some of my daily "emotional rants" and "topics of hate." Wow, pretty strong language, but not based in fact. Seems like a stretch perhaps, but do you have me confused with RamRod?
I don't agree with it, but I accept your atheism without judgment. Perhaps you could do the same with respect to my Christianity.
Unlike you, I have a history of attempting to maintain good relations on here with people on both sides of the political aisle. Sometimes I fuck up. But you’ve been a prick since you arrived, in the same manner as Bowl.
Whoever you are, I’m sick of your passive aggressive personal shots. If you’re going to take one, don’t cry when I return the favor.
That's pretty funny. You falsely accuse me of "emotional rants" and then proceed with an emotional rant.
No, I'm not a "prick." I treat people respectfully, except for two or three who lack self-control and civility. You seem to be moving into that territory.
I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
Tell you what. Don't reply to my posts and I won't reply to yours. Deal?
Huh. I thought I was timid? But its good to know you're following my posts with such interest.
Your problem isn't in replying, it's in taking potshots and then coyly hiding behind "oh did that offend you?" reasoning, feigning outrage at someone who gives it back to you.
Tell you what. Don't reply to my posts and I won't reply to yours. Deal?
So don't take personal shots in your posts at me--whether you are replying to my posts or not (like your post in this thread that was not a reply to my post)--and I won't return the criticism.
I thought I was clear, but let me try again: your replies don't concern me. You've been coming at me since you arrived (probably why you want to keep your Rivals username secret), and I only react in this way when you make it personal.Think that’s the second or third time I’ve asked about your rivals name. And you continue to refuse to provide it. Pretty telling.Many people, particularly on the emotional side, need to post emotional rants every day about their topic of hate. And then claim they are Christians.I don't know what that last sentence means.Or, unlike you, I like to know what I’m talking about.@twenty He likes to read the room before wading in.
“Christian” Bowlmania at it again.
Not sure what I said to set you off. Many people, particularly those on the timid side, like to read the room before offering an opinion.
What was your screen name at Rivals?
I know Rivals as a sports recruiting site and I've checked it out more than a few times in the past. I don't believe I've ever had an account there though and, in any event, I don't see how that's relevant.
You seem to be coming on very strong here with the Christian references. Yes, I'm Christian as I'm sure most people here are. I don't talk about that very much, though, and I never proselytize here, as some do. I did mention that I'm a Christian in the thread I started about the shift among a number of people in this administration, in public statements, from "God" to "Christ" or "Jesus." In the same thread, I discussed a specific recent incident involving Hegseth. I thought it was important to disclose my religion so I wouldn't be accused of having some "anti-Christian" agenda.
You seem to be challenging my faith in this discussion, with a not-so-veiled reference to me as someone who "claims" to be a Christian. I guess you think I'm some massive hypocrite or "faux" Christian. I'd like to know why you believe that. I'd also like you to point out some of my daily "emotional rants" and "topics of hate." Wow, pretty strong language, but not based in fact. Seems like a stretch perhaps, but do you have me confused with RamRod?
I don't agree with it, but I accept your atheism without judgment. Perhaps you could do the same with respect to my Christianity.
Unlike you, I have a history of attempting to maintain good relations on here with people on both sides of the political aisle. Sometimes I fuck up. But you’ve been a prick since you arrived, in the same manner as Bowl.
Whoever you are, I’m sick of your passive aggressive personal shots. If you’re going to take one, don’t cry when I return the favor.
That's pretty funny. You falsely accuse me of "emotional rants" and then proceed with an emotional rant.
No, I'm not a "prick." I treat people respectfully, except for two or three who lack self-control and civility. You seem to be moving into that territory.
I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
Tell you what. Don't reply to my posts and I won't reply to yours. Deal?
Huh. I thought I was timid? But its good to know you're following my posts with such interest.
Your problem isn't in replying, it's in taking potshots and then coyly hiding behind "oh did that offend you?" reasoning, feigning outrage at someone who gives it back to you.
Tell you what. Don't reply to my posts and I won't reply to yours. Deal?
So don't take personal shots in your posts at me--whether you are replying to my posts or not (like your post in this thread that was not a reply to my post)--and I won't return the criticism.
I've been coming at you? Are you kidding me? That's classic projection. You've been sarcastically and condescendingly challenging me on everything since I joined this place in November, from mocking my use of certain words by repeatedly putting them in quotes, to providing unprovoked snark like "grow up," to personal attacks like calling me a "prick." Lately I've watched you go after other posters - - solid posters - - with personal attacks.
Yes, I did suggest you're "timid" because of your habit of dropping a link or some AI-generated text without providing any commentary or opinion. That does strike me as timid, but if "timid" is the worst thing anyone ever calls you, you're doing ok. Doesn't quite rise to the level of "prick." In any event, my apologies for offending you.
Finally, and for the second time, I don't and didn't have a "Rivals" username but if it makes you feel better to allege that I'm the same person you hate on another site, go for it.
I'm done with this nonsense.
That's funny and I get your point. Truth of the matter is, all people are unique and we express or manifest our uniqueness most at our highest, most sublimated state.I saw a post from you last week where you called two of the better posters here "self-righteous." Look in the mirror, dude.
I took no offense. I know I'm right. Brad is a douche.
I wish you posted more often. Your content is always worth reading.
He's not a mod anymore... his pull is gone.
You can tell him how you really feel.
He seems like an informed, reasonable person and he doesn't launch attacks against other posters. That's good enough for me.
Yeah, if everyone posted like me this place would be... boring as hell.
That said, nothing personal but fuck all you faggots.
I've been coming at you? Are you kidding me? That's classic projection. You've been sarcastically and condescendingly challenging me on everything since I joined this place in November, from mocking my use of certain words by repeatedly putting them in quotes, to providing unprovoked snark like "grow up," to personal attacks like calling me a "prick." Lately I've watched you go after other posters - - solid posters - - with personal attacks.
Yes, I did suggest you're "timid" because of your habit of dropping a link or some AI-generated text without providing any commentary or opinion. That does strike me as timid, but if "timid" is the worst thing anyone ever calls you, you're doing ok. Doesn't quite rise to the level of "prick." In any event, my apologies for offending you.
Finally, and for the second time, I don't and didn't have a "Rivals" username but if it makes you feel better to allege that I'm the same person you hate on another site, go for it.
I'm done with this nonsense.
Correct. You've been coming at me. From the start. Since I finished my work early and I'm feeling a bit salty after a shit week already, let me explain:
Here's your first post to me on here, unprovoked:
No one in power on either side of the aisle seems to care though.
Yes, I always find myself thinking, "The Dems in power just need to care about Trump more. If only they would show more interest in what he is doing, that would fix everything."
That's disingenuous. You know full well he's talking about a specific, critical issue.
Of course, you ran away and didn't respond when I called you out on it. A week later, unprovoked:
@goatI sometimes wander over here out of curiosity and I can't figure this place out. It's usually one of two things I see. First, a retired military man is being inexplicably mocked by a male pretending to be a woman. Or there's the poster you're responding to. To his credit, he's trying (desperately) to drive engagement but with "TLDR" content that seems to be AI-generated. Bizarre little world.
That you didn't use my name is classic Bowlmania passive aggressiveness. You two must be twins. Next interaction (other than a random post you made of Joe Rogan clip that he didn't like ICE's enforcement in MN--guess you were "reading the room") I could find and my response (that you didn't even acknowledge):
Oh my God. Do you usually lie like this?
This is what the mayor said in that clip, beginning at 6:16: "We're in a position right now where we have residents that are asking the very limited number of police officers that we have to fight ICE agents on the street. To stand by their neighbors. We cannot be at a place right now in America where we have two governmental entities that are literally fighting one another."
Frey was clearlyrejectingthat idea/proposal of some residents.
Be more responsible in your posting.
I will. Good catch. That was an ungenerous reading (listening, actually) of what Frey said. In my defense, I was thrown by the very sentence you highlight where he implies that the police actually are fighting with ICE. I don't think they are, and read into that Frey's wishful thinking. But that defense shows I already had something in mind about what was going on when I listened that blinded me.
Your interpretation is clearly the better, more generous, and reasonable one, and I shouldn't have written what I did. I was wrong.
To be clear, those weren't my words. That was a quote from the far-left Wall Street Journal.
Lol.
