Between Noem and Bondi, @carramrod may be onto something about not allowing women. These two are some of the most embarrassing examples you'll ever see.
Dems are already building impeachment files a mile high to take down those 2 next year. They a don't really give a shit about Bondi or Noem. They actually love Bondi as she made a deal with the deep state but they will use her corruption to target Vance.
Trump doesn't have a clue what is going on as Susie Wiles blocks all access to him. These 3 women have always been the problem.
.
Between Noem and Bondi, @carramrod may be onto something about not allowing women. These two are some of the most embarrassing examples you'll ever see.
Anyone who fatally shoots their 14 month-old puppy (and goat) and then writes about it in a memoir is beyond fucked up. JD Vance, in responding to a question about a different animal abuser, says it better than I could: "If you can actually cause suffering to an innocent animal, you're probably the kind of person who doesn't worry about suffering in people as well and that's been my experience." He added that animal abuse is a tell-tale sign of "a really terrible person."
Her various cringe photo ops (including the one in front of the caged inmates at the prison in El Salvador) are awful, and her relationship with the man alleged to be her not-so-secret lover is likely humiliating for her husband and embarrassing for the family.
Regarding Bondi, Wednesday's hearing was the most unprofessional appearance I've ever seen from an Attorney General.
But, hey, the Dow is/was over 50,000!!!
But still no arrests. Supposedly Epstein only trafficked little girls to himself 🤪
https://twitter.com/i/status/2023020335432688119
Bondi says that's it. None of the remaining 3,000,000 pages in the Epstein files will be released. She and Blanche say they've fully complied with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, notwithstanding that what they've held back includes internal memos detailing investigative and charging decisions.
This is far from transparency. The federal government is protecting predators and pedos.
Bondi criticised after saying all Epstein files have been released
Bondi says that's it. None of the remaining 3,000,000 pages in the Epstein files will be released. She and Blanche say they've fully complied with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, notwithstanding that what they've held back includes internal memos detailing investigative and charging decisions.
This is far from transparency. The federal government is protecting predators and pedos.
Bondi criticised after saying all Epstein files have been released
Who are they protecting?
Use your real name on a public forum like X and name names.
Who are they protecting?
Use your real name on a public forum like X and name names.
From the files:
"I found at least 3 very good young poor." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
"Thank you for a fun night. Your littlest girl was a little naughty." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
"And this one is (i think) totally your girl." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
A number of Epstein survivors who have reviewed portions of the released files say the files shield those who specifically enabled the convicted sex offender’s abuse, as well as others named in the survivors’ statements that were completely redacted.
One survivor referenced an FBI form in the file where entire pages were redacted. In one instance, there was a seven-page statement of what the victim experienced and then relayed to the FBI. Four of the seven pages were entirely redacted, so no names or descriptions of the men involved were disclosed.
The draft indictment out of the Southern District of Florida, which was abandoned as part of Epstein's sweetheart plea deal, would have charged Epstein and three others. The men are accused of conspiring to "persuade, induce, and entice individuals who had not attained the age of 18 years to engage in prostitution.” But the names of the three men are redacted in the released files.
Finally, there are prosecution memos that address decisions to investigate and/or prosecute. Under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they should have been produced but weren't.
SO IT'S KINDA HARD TO NAME NAMES BECAUSE NAMES LINKED WITH PROBABLE CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY REDACTED. THIS IS A MASSIVE COVER-UP. THE PREDATORS HAVE BEEN PROTECTED.
Hypothetically....
If some guy was accused by >25 people of having sex with sheep, regularly denied it, but often dropped hints over decades about how much he likes having sex with sheep, ran a sheep beauty pageant and bragged about how awesomely hot the sheep looked to him, was best friends with the most well-known sheep banger on the planet, a guy who was well-known for passing around his favorite sheep to his friends to have sex with and who mentioned that guy tens of thousands of times while writing of their awesome sheep banging escapades, the guy who also wished the best to those still in jail for banging sheep,
What would be the odds that the guy was a sheep banger?
Hypothetically
"You can't make someone listen to reason if they aren't willing to think"-- Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
Who are they protecting?
Use your real name on a public forum like X and name names.
From the files:
"I found at least 3 very good young poor." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
"Thank you for a fun night. Your littlest girl was a little naughty." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
"And this one is (i think) totally your girl." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
A number of Epstein survivors who have reviewed portions of the released files say the files shield those who specifically enabled the convicted sex offender’s abuse, as well as others named in the survivors’ statements that were completely redacted.
One survivor referenced an FBI form in the file where entire pages were redacted. In one instance, there was a seven-page statement of what the victim experienced and then relayed to the FBI. Four of the seven pages were entirely redacted, so no names or descriptions of the men involved were disclosed.
The draft indictment out of the Southern District of Florida, which was abandoned as part of Epstein's sweetheart plea deal, would have charged Epstein and three others. The men are accused of conspiring to "persuade, induce, and entice individuals who had not attained the age of 18 years to engage in prostitution.” But the names of the three men are redacted in the released files.
Finally, there are prosecution memos that address decisions to investigate and/or prosecute. Under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they should have been produced but weren't.
SO IT'S KINDA HARD TO NAME NAMES BECAUSE NAMES LINKED WITH PROBABLE CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY REDACTED. THIS IS A MASSIVE COVER-UP. THE PREDATORS HAVE BEEN PROTECTED.
I’m a huge fan of Massie as a member of Congress. He’s a straight shooter and votes the way he thinks is correct despite backlash. He and Khanna said they had the names and were going to read them in public…if the DOJ didn’t release the files. What happened?
Hypothetically....
If some guy was accused by >25 people of having sex with sheep, regularly denied it, but often dropped hints over decades about how much he likes having sex with sheep, ran a sheep beauty pageant and bragged about how awesomely hot the sheep looked to him, was best friends with the most well-known sheep banger on the planet, a guy who was well-known for passing around his favorite sheep to his friends to have sex with and who mentioned that guy tens of thousands of times while writing of their awesome sheep banging escapades, the guy who also wished the best to those still in jail for banging sheep,
What would be the odds that the guy was a sheep banger?
Hypothetically
You are one weird individual…it’s no wonder they kicked you off the farm
Who are they protecting?
Use your real name on a public forum like X and name names.
From the files:
"I found at least 3 very good young poor." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
"Thank you for a fun night. Your littlest girl was a little naughty." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
"And this one is (i think) totally your girl." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
A number of Epstein survivors who have reviewed portions of the released files say the files shield those who specifically enabled the convicted sex offender’s abuse, as well as others named in the survivors’ statements that were completely redacted.
One survivor referenced an FBI form in the file where entire pages were redacted. In one instance, there was a seven-page statement of what the victim experienced and then relayed to the FBI. Four of the seven pages were entirely redacted, so no names or descriptions of the men involved were disclosed.
The draft indictment out of the Southern District of Florida, which was abandoned as part of Epstein's sweetheart plea deal, would have charged Epstein and three others. The men are accused of conspiring to "persuade, induce, and entice individuals who had not attained the age of 18 years to engage in prostitution.” But the names of the three men are redacted in the released files.
Finally, there are prosecution memos that address decisions to investigate and/or prosecute. Under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they should have been produced but weren't.
SO IT'S KINDA HARD TO NAME NAMES BECAUSE NAMES LINKED WITH PROBABLE CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY REDACTED. THIS IS A MASSIVE COVER-UP. THE PREDATORS HAVE BEEN PROTECTED.
I’m a huge fan of Massie as a member of Congress. He’s a straight shooter and votes the way he thinks is correct despite backlash. He and Khanna said they had the names and were going to read them in public…if the DOJ didn’t release the files. What happened?
They did. Although it may be not all of them deserved the attention.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/13/four-men-unredacted-epstein-files-no-ties-ro-khanna
Who are they protecting?
Use your real name on a public forum like X and name names.
From the files:
"I found at least 3 very good young poor." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
"Thank you for a fun night. Your littlest girl was a little naughty." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
"And this one is (i think) totally your girl." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
A number of Epstein survivors who have reviewed portions of the released files say the files shield those who specifically enabled the convicted sex offender’s abuse, as well as others named in the survivors’ statements that were completely redacted.
One survivor referenced an FBI form in the file where entire pages were redacted. In one instance, there was a seven-page statement of what the victim experienced and then relayed to the FBI. Four of the seven pages were entirely redacted, so no names or descriptions of the men involved were disclosed.
The draft indictment out of the Southern District of Florida, which was abandoned as part of Epstein's sweetheart plea deal, would have charged Epstein and three others. The men are accused of conspiring to "persuade, induce, and entice individuals who had not attained the age of 18 years to engage in prostitution.” But the names of the three men are redacted in the released files.
Finally, there are prosecution memos that address decisions to investigate and/or prosecute. Under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they should have been produced but weren't.
SO IT'S KINDA HARD TO NAME NAMES BECAUSE NAMES LINKED WITH PROBABLE CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY REDACTED. THIS IS A MASSIVE COVER-UP. THE PREDATORS HAVE BEEN PROTECTED.
I’m a huge fan of Massie as a member of Congress. He’s a straight shooter and votes the way he thinks is correct despite backlash. He and Khanna said they had the names and were going to read them in public…if the DOJ didn’t release the files. What happened?
Here’s the thing with Massie. I also like him, and think the country would be a much better place if we had 535 Massie’s in congress.
He is going to the mat on the Epstein files and that doesn’t bother me. What does is he seems more willing to engage in this crusade rather than other ostensibly Libertarian priorities.
Can he bring this energy on Social Security cuts? Medicare? Stuff that actually matters.
That might be pissing in the wind but I’d love to see the sustained effort on those things that he’s shown with Epstein.
Here’s the thing with Massie. I also like him, and think the country would be a much better place if we had 535 Massie’s in congress.
He is going to the mat on the Epstein files and that doesn’t bother me. What does is he seems more willing to engage in this crusade rather than other ostensibly Libertarian priorities.
Can he bring this energy on Social Security cuts? Medicare? Stuff that actually matters.
That might be pissing in the wind but I’d love to see the sustained effort on those things that he’s shown with Epstein.
It's just smart politics. Massie knows that the admin's handling of this whole thing has been wildly unpopular, and, without the sheer force of Trump's own personality, would be politically unsustainable. Once Trump finally fades into the background, everyone else will be left holding the bag, careers ruined, while the people who were the public face of opposition, like Massie, will gain immense political capital all along the ideological spectrum.
Who are they protecting?
Use your real name on a public forum like X and name names.
From the files:
"I found at least 3 very good young poor." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
"Thank you for a fun night. Your littlest girl was a little naughty." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
"And this one is (i think) totally your girl." -email to Epstein with name of sender redacted
A number of Epstein survivors who have reviewed portions of the released files say the files shield those who specifically enabled the convicted sex offender’s abuse, as well as others named in the survivors’ statements that were completely redacted.
One survivor referenced an FBI form in the file where entire pages were redacted. In one instance, there was a seven-page statement of what the victim experienced and then relayed to the FBI. Four of the seven pages were entirely redacted, so no names or descriptions of the men involved were disclosed.
The draft indictment out of the Southern District of Florida, which was abandoned as part of Epstein's sweetheart plea deal, would have charged Epstein and three others. The men are accused of conspiring to "persuade, induce, and entice individuals who had not attained the age of 18 years to engage in prostitution.” But the names of the three men are redacted in the released files.
Finally, there are prosecution memos that address decisions to investigate and/or prosecute. Under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, they should have been produced but weren't.
SO IT'S KINDA HARD TO NAME NAMES BECAUSE NAMES LINKED WITH PROBABLE CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY REDACTED. THIS IS A MASSIVE COVER-UP. THE PREDATORS HAVE BEEN PROTECTED.
I’m a huge fan of Massie as a member of Congress. He’s a straight shooter and votes the way he thinks is correct despite backlash. He and Khanna said they had the names and were going to read them in public…if the DOJ didn’t release the files. What happened?
They did. Although it may be not all of them deserved the attention.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/13/four-men-unredacted-epstein-files-no-ties-ro-khanna
They said they had seen the names but all they did was read names off a DOJ press release. They said they were part of an Epstein criminal operation.
Was that true?
@socks-shorts-1-2-3-swish Trump is on the horns of a dilemma. Maxwell's lawyer says Maxwell will clear Trump of any wrongdoing in exchange for clemency. Despite Maxwell's obvious credibility issues, that deal would allow Trump to take a victory lap and claim "total exoneration." On the other hand, giving any kind of a break to this POS (Maxwell) could be disastrous politically. Should be interesting.Trump seems to change his story all of the time on when and why he started distancing himself from Epstein.
We have heard from Trump himself and from others defending him some totally different stories, that -He thought Epstein was too creepy; -Epstein hired people who had been working at Mar-a-Lago; -Epstein and Trump had a falling out over a property that they both wanted and Epstein got, through some allegedly underhanded means.
The weight of the evidence would seem to suggest that Trump wasn't bothered so much by Epstein liking and maybe even raping "girls on the younger side" but at some point a business deal or action by Epstein led to Donald distancing himself from his former "best friend" (Donald's words)
Not sure how anything could be disastrous politically to trump. 30 to 40% of this country will support anything he does without question (another 30 to 40% already despise him). Most Republicans remaining in DC are there because they are willing to do whatever trump says because they want to stay in office. Those with a spine are voted out already or aren't running for reelection so dont care about the repurcussions of standing up to him...but too few in number to do much.
Trump said he could murder someone on a public street and not lose support. Underestimated his following as he doesn't even have to be the one to pull the trigger (see ICE)
Trump is in the Epstein files as much as anyone but still has his base loving him
What exactly could he do at this point and lost any support? Pardoning maxwell would be defended just like everything else he has done and Dems that gripe about it will be labeled by his supporters as having TDS
Latest Post: Portal Kombat (Basketball Edition) Our newest member: Mark Wittenbrink Recent Posts Unread Posts
