Gaza?! That’s an unforced error. You mean Hamas. The charge of genocide refers to the Gazan citizens not the regime/terrorist group Hamas. Netanyahu’s excuse of Hamas hiding amongst citizens doesn’t justify or permit war crimes or crimes against humanity. I’m willing to accept the “lesser” charge until independent parties have an opportunity to gather concrete evidence.I understand the argument. Still not genocide. Rwanda was genocide. October 7/was genocide. The Mullahs slaughter of thousands of protesters a couple of months ago was not genocide. Gaza is not genocide. Study and then think about the antecedents and maybe you’ll get it. Gaza always had the means to stop the bombing.
Netanyahu is indisputably a war criminal.
@co-hoosier
Btw, while it is true October 7 was horrific beyond belief, Netanyahu’s “solution” succeeded in killing many of the hostages he was presumably trying to rescue.
After 9/11 Bush used the brilliant and absolutely correct solution of garnering support from the civilized world before going on the warpath.
Netanyahu stupidly and savagely squandered his opportunity for world support, in particular, support from Middle Eastern so-called allies in putting pressure on Hamas to surrender the hostages.
Instead he succeeded in killing many of his own citizens while bulldozing much of Gaza. Freaking maniac, freaking psychopath.
Gaza?! That’s an unforced error. You mean Hamas. The charge of genocide refers to the Gazan citizens not the regime/terrorist group Hamas. Netanyahu’s excuse of Hamas hiding amongst citizens doesn’t justify or permit war crimes or crimes against humanity. I’m willing to accept the “lesser” charge until independent parties have an opportunity to gather concrete evidence.I understand the argument. Still not genocide. Rwanda was genocide. October 7/was genocide. The Mullahs slaughter of thousands of protesters a couple of months ago was not genocide. Gaza is not genocide. Study and then think about the antecedents and maybe you’ll get it. Gaza always had the means to stop the bombing.
Netanyahu is indisputably a war criminal.
You should take the time to learn what indisputably means & use it properly…
Dispute to your heart’s content. If Netanyahu ever ends up at the Hague, he will end his life in prison.Gaza?! That’s an unforced error. You mean Hamas. The charge of genocide refers to the Gazan citizens not the regime/terrorist group Hamas. Netanyahu’s excuse of Hamas hiding amongst citizens doesn’t justify or permit war crimes or crimes against humanity. I’m willing to accept the “lesser” charge until independent parties have an opportunity to gather concrete evidence.I understand the argument. Still not genocide. Rwanda was genocide. October 7/was genocide. The Mullahs slaughter of thousands of protesters a couple of months ago was not genocide. Gaza is not genocide. Study and then think about the antecedents and maybe you’ll get it. Gaza always had the means to stop the bombing.
Netanyahu is indisputably a war criminal.
You should take the time to learn what indisputably means & use it properly…
Dispute to your heart’s content. If Netanyahu ever ends up at the Hague, he will end his life in prison.Gaza?! That’s an unforced error. You mean Hamas. The charge of genocide refers to the Gazan citizens not the regime/terrorist group Hamas. Netanyahu’s excuse of Hamas hiding amongst citizens doesn’t justify or permit war crimes or crimes against humanity. I’m willing to accept the “lesser” charge until independent parties have an opportunity to gather concrete evidence.I understand the argument. Still not genocide. Rwanda was genocide. October 7/was genocide. The Mullahs slaughter of thousands of protesters a couple of months ago was not genocide. Gaza is not genocide. Study and then think about the antecedents and maybe you’ll get it. Gaza always had the means to stop the bombing.
Netanyahu is indisputably a war criminal.
You should take the time to learn what indisputably means & use it properly…
That’s cute. The majority of the world’s population is not under the jurisdiction of the ICC. For good reason.
They can issue all the arrest warrants they want. It’s like a child playing lawyer.
I wouldn’t expect Netanyahu to appear in The Hague. He knows he’s a war criminal, unlike you guys.
I agree with most of that but the Trump loyalists (or at least the "America First" faction now) have long considered me a neocon.
https://twitter.com/HeartlandDiary/status/2035935584603267444
@aloha-hoosier as goat said, there are two factions splitting as a result of this and other events. Some support the war, but may oppose.
It's continuing to splinter. It needs to be obliterated, but for real, not like the President said about Iran's nuclear weapons program.@aloha-hoosier as goat said, there are two factions splitting as a result of this and other events. Some support the war, but may oppose.
Trump's incredible shrinking tent
Dispute to your heart’s content. If Netanyahu ever ends up at the Hague, he will end his life in prison.Gaza?! That’s an unforced error. You mean Hamas. The charge of genocide refers to the Gazan citizens not the regime/terrorist group Hamas. Netanyahu’s excuse of Hamas hiding amongst citizens doesn’t justify or permit war crimes or crimes against humanity. I’m willing to accept the “lesser” charge until independent parties have an opportunity to gather concrete evidence.I understand the argument. Still not genocide. Rwanda was genocide. October 7/was genocide. The Mullahs slaughter of thousands of protesters a couple of months ago was not genocide. Gaza is not genocide. Study and then think about the antecedents and maybe you’ll get it. Gaza always had the means to stop the bombing.
Netanyahu is indisputably a war criminal.
You should take the time to learn what indisputably means & use it properly…
That’s cute. The majority of the world’s population is not under the jurisdiction of the ICC. For good reason.
They can issue all the arrest warrants they want. It’s like a child playing lawyer.
As we talked about in the other thread on this, the ICC has both personal and territorial jurisdiction. Bibi's alleged crimes were committed in a territory that falls under the ICC's jurisdiction. Therefore, any state party to the Rome Statute would be under obligation by treaty to effect his apprehension and delivery to the ICC (with some possible procedural exceptions that protect treaty obligations that state parties might owe other parties regarding immunity outside the Rome Statute itself). It doesn't matter that the ICC doesn't hold personal jurisdiction over Bibi. If he is accused of a crime under their purview within the territorial jurisdiction of the court, they can still issue a warrant and demand state parties fulfill their obligations.
In other words, don't expect Bibi to visit most of Europe anytime soon. Just to be safe. This is why, since the indictment, he has only visited the United States, save for a single trip to Hungary, which was only facilitated by Orban's decision to ignore the warrant and announce his intention that Hungary withdraw from the treaty.