I’m seeing a pattern developing & will try to make my posts more “accessible” for you.
You're one of those posters that isn't smart enough to know he's stupid. What was your handle on the WC? I have it narrowed down to two nitwits but would like to make sure. I understand that desire to start over when you're as dumb as you are, but it will catch up with you. It's not possible to hide stupid.
I’m seeing a pattern developing & will try to make my posts more “accessible” for you.
You're one of those posters that isn't smart enough to know he's stupid. What was your handle on the WC? I have it narrowed down to two nitwits but would like to make sure. I understand that desire to start over when you're as dumb as you are, but it will catch up with you. It's not possible to hide stupid.
I’m seeing a pattern developing & will try to make my posts more “accessible” for you.
I’m not the one that can’t keep up.😉
https://twitter.com/endwokeness/status/1943749655319511434?s=46
One benefit of tariffs.
Tariff revenues are starting to become too big to ignore.
Tariff revenues Tax increases are starting to become too big to ignore.
FIFY
Pretty dumb. I would say I’m generally opposed to tariffs. But coming from someone like yourself who wanted to let income tax cuts expire resulting in one of the largest tax increases in U.S. history, that’s just too rich.
Give me a consumption tax all day. And the inflation data simply isn’t showing the effects of tariffs, for now. It appears manufacturers and importers are eating a lot more of them than was originally thought, again for now.
Oh yes you are. I bet your IQ is right around 80. Right?You're one of those posters that isn't smart enough to know he's stupid. What was your handle on the WC? I have it narrowed down to two nitwits but would like to make sure. I understand that desire to start over when you're as dumb as you are, but it will catch up with you. It's not possible to hide stupid.
I’m seeing a pattern developing & will try to make my posts more “accessible” for you.
I’m not the one that can’t keep up.😉
Maybe Trump should adopt the Ben Shapiro strategy for the midterms? How would that work out?
https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1944874865292460070?t=NhoW37Gps-oSlurXb1pyTw&s=19
Maybe Trump should adopt the Ben Shapiro strategy for the midterms? How would that work out?
https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1944874865292460070?t=NhoW37Gps-oSlurXb1pyTw&s=19
He should start by getting his facts straight. The standard retirement age for SS hasn't been 65 for a long time.
Maybe Trump should adopt the Ben Shapiro strategy for the midterms? How would that work out?
https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/1944874865292460070?t=NhoW37Gps-oSlurXb1pyTw&s=19
He should start by getting his facts straight. The standard retirement age for SS hasn't been 65 for a long time.
Never been punched
Hope is not optimism, which expects things to turn out well, but something rooted in the conviction that there is good worth working for. - Seamus Heaney, Irish poet and likely Hoosier basketball fan.
POTFB
Generalizations like yours, which in truth are very likely a very small minority of the people I'm talking about, are why we can't solve this problem.Can’t generalize like that. Stay at home moms aren’t paying in. Some work hard and don’t make a ton of money. Farm laborers, etc. How about the people with mental disabilities that are maybe capable of janitorial work or something. Works hard but doesn’t make a lot. Why no safety net for these people?No safety nets, if you didn’t save enough, keep working. If you can’t , apply for disability. Yes, that may mean that some may have to do without cigarettes, booze, cell phone, tv’s etc., but better the leeches do without than the folks that earned their own money…
Stay at home moms are staying at home because either their husband makes enough that they don’t have to work or they getting support payments from McMurtries. People with disabilities can get disability pay. You stated safety nets for those that didn’t work enough, but how often is the case not that they didn’t make enough but that they didn’t save enough? I don’t agree with incentivizing, subsidizing, or rewarding people that didn’t work enough or save enough by choice, especially if they’re paying $150 per month for a family cell plan, $13 for a pack of smokes, etc. Safety nets should exist, but not for people that made poor choices. @bradstevens - Yes, I understand that it is not politically viable because we have created a welfare state.
What an impotent group you & your majority must be then…
Impotent is not nearly descriptive enough...