Where were you when Biden was openly recruiting trannies?
That’s one of the dumbest things you’ve ever posted and 99 percent of your posts are super dumb.
These people are obsessed. Clay & Buck have been all trannies all the time for over a week now, no matter what the topic at hand.
Because they have a bloodlust for right wingers.
https://twitter.com/MaryMargOlohan/status/1969106294595301635
It certainly is a political organization. I guess I think if you just have some advertisements there and a booth or whatever, it wouldn't be a problem. But your overarching concern--that we shouldn't politicize the military in any way, shape, or form--is an important one.It’s a political organization. It’s no different than recruiting at a Republican or Democratic event. We do not ever do that. We should never do that.I don't think what is described in that article is "doing politics."The military doesn’t do politics. It’s actually forbidden by law. So political recruiting should not happen.Why not?This is not OK:
Military leaders consider recruiting campaign centered on Charlie Kirk
"As part of the potential new campaign, Pentagon leaders are considering using chapters of Kirk’s political organization, Turning Point USA, at schools across the U.S. as military recruitment centers, the officials said. That could include inviting recruiters to be present at events or advertising for the military at the chapters, one of them explained."
You go where the fish are. If they are at Turning Point events, go there and recruit them.
The military is political whether we like it or not. The same goes for any uniformed organization. Those who throw rocks at border patrol and cops would rather poke their eyes out than join the military. I read a comment once that most military recruits come from the old confederacy and red states and localities.
I don’t think having recruiting booths at either GOP events or Dem events is politicizing the military. Politicizing to me, means uniformed, on duty, personnel actively supporting a political party or position. Most presidents are political when they address academy graduations. But it isn't politicizing the military.
It certainly is and it would be a violation of the law to do recruiting at the DNC or RNC. It implies endorsement of a political party. As for the speeches, most Presidents are capable of making them not political at those graduation ceremonies and don’t do political speeches.I don’t think having recruiting booths at either GOP events or Dem events is politicizing the military. Politicizing to me, means uniformed, on duty, personnel actively supporting a political party or position. Most presidents are political when they address academy graduations. But it isn't politicizing the military.
Is it a statute or a DoD reg?It certainly is and it would be a violation of the law to do recruiting at the DNC or RNC. It implies endorsement of a political party. As for the speeches, most Presidents are capable of making them not political at those graduation ceremonies and don’t do political speeches.I don’t think having recruiting booths at either GOP events or Dem events is politicizing the military. Politicizing to me, means uniformed, on duty, personnel actively supporting a political party or position. Most presidents are political when they address academy graduations. But it isn't politicizing the military.
This is driven by what is going on with American males in our society. At some point, I hope the left starts caring more about this issue:I don’t think having recruiting booths at either GOP events or Dem events is politicizing the military. Politicizing to me, means uniformed, on duty, personnel actively supporting a political party or position. Most presidents are political when they address academy graduations. But it isn't politicizing the military.
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2024/06/14/armys-recruiting-problem-male.html?amp
The military doesn’t do politics. It’s actually forbidden by law. So political recruiting should not happen.Why not?This is not OK:
Military leaders consider recruiting campaign centered on Charlie Kirk
Things are getting weird. I can’t see how anyone would think this is a good idea.
Is it a statute or a DoD reg?Hatch Act.It certainly is and it would be a violation of the law to do recruiting at the DNC or RNC. It implies endorsement of a political party. As for the speeches, most Presidents are capable of making them not political at those graduation ceremonies and don’t do political speeches.I don’t think having recruiting booths at either GOP events or Dem events is politicizing the military. Politicizing to me, means uniformed, on duty, personnel actively supporting a political party or position. Most presidents are political when they address academy graduations. But it isn't politicizing the military.
@co-hoosier Well, that doesn’t matter. It matters that the military knows it isn’t to do politics.
Saw some of his memorial. He wasn’t doing political debates, it’s quite evident they were more like tent revivals.
And they were effective.
Killed for spreading the gospel.
Meanwhile, the guy that planned to kill DJT at the golf course is convicted:
Man who represented himself is found guilty of trying to assassinate Trump at Florida golf course
Meanwhile, the guy that planned to kill DJT at the golf course is convicted:
Man who represented himself is found guilty of trying to assassinate Trump at Florida golf course
He tried to stab himself through the throat when the verdict was read.