@big-ryan bc when your cries only involve Trump and there was silence with what transpired with the Dems democracy doesn’t really seem like your concern. It’s more just tds
@big-ryan The threat to our democracy is back 💥🔥🙌 LFG!!!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣. He’ll be out of office and it’ll be forgotten and on to the next Somalia scam congress insider trading or don jr defalcation or whatever
No, this won't be forgotten. It's unprecedented and deplorable.
Refute my links. Explain why rampant corruption at the top has no impact on democracy.
Forget it. You can't.
What you can do, though, is post 20 times each day how Trump is bad but the Democrat alternative was, is and always will be worse. Just an appallingly stupid take.
@big-ryan it’s the only sane take bc the alternative is all that matters to those who can think as opposed to spending all day trying to find articles about Trump and writing absurdly long posts about a guy who can’t run again all day long
@big-ryan how many threads you think you’ll start today about Trump? Maybe shoot for 50 posts? Threat to democracy posts 🤣🤔. Ponderous man. Ponderous
Keeps getting better 😂
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/19/trump-irs-settlement-tax-returns
Uh what
Yeah. To be honest, this is probably the bigger story that everybody is mostly ignoring that is even more egregious than the 1.8 billion atrocity.
If there is any tax law that Trump OR ANYONE IN HIS FAMILY OR OTHER MAJOR CEOs OF HIS COMPANY has violated in the last 20 years, discovery cannot happen because those IRS returns are sealed.
They can never be reviewed.
Ever.
It is essentially saying that Trump's family is above the law (at least financially).
Any Republicans want to try to defend this?
@squeakyclean agreed but i'd be curious to know more and won't take the time to research it. are these cases currently pending in the tax court? i don't believe a settlement can occur with tax court judge approval. the dist court of course. you can dismiss do whatever. and i'm out over my skis a bit but i dont believe that's teh case with the the tax courts
Man, you’re sense. I said I haven’t read it. I have no interest in reading it, though I’m certain I would understand it if I did. However, you say you read it but refuse to explain what it says. The evidence says you haven’t read it and/or don’t understand it. Your history indicates that you’d be incapable of understanding it if you did read it. I know this is very difficult for you to understand but that’s about as much as I can dumb it down for you.That’s classic projection there. You haven’t read it and wouldn’t understand it if you did. I’d bet money on it.I didn’t say I read it, you did. I honestly do not believe you read it or are capable of understanding it if you did. Prove me wrong.You’re right. Please explain it to me…
I don’t care if you get it or not, or agree with it or not, or what you believe my level of understanding of the subject is. I linked a study, that’s all. What should matter to you is whether you understand it. You can choose to read it & other studies on the subject, educate yourself, & make an informed decision either way, or remain ignorant. Your history here suggests you’ll choose willful ignorance, which is fine by me…
That’s ok, whether I understand it or not is of no consequence to you. Do you understand it? That’s what you should be focused on. You’re not the only one that will choose willfull ignorance when it comes to sensitive subject matter. Notice there aren’t many that are weighing in on the study, & those like you that are are responding are only doing so with empty attacks & insults with no real substantive or relevant posts…
So I was correct, you choose willful ignorance.
Notice there aren’t many that are weighing in on the study,
... including you. You're provided a one-paragraph abstract, authored by three criminologists, about longitudinal genetic research.
So it’s false? Any links to studies that debunk? Are you skeptical of the role of MOA in aggressive, violent behavior, it’s prevalence across different ethnicities, or both?
@bar-down (strictly for fun)
There is a non-Dem alternative to Trump: 25A. I’d take Vance in a heartbeat. Yesterday.
@hhlurker nah trump is totally fine. he's nothing like biden. he's all there. nuts. but nuts in the same way he's always been nuts
You’ve been asking around for an alternative to Dems as if there weren’t one. Voilà.
@hhlurker in 28. i was asking for an alternative dem not an alternative to dems
Two cops who were assaulted while defending the United States Capitol against the violent January 6 mob filed suit today to block the illegal slush fund that Trump’s lawyer Blanche set up Monday.
“’By creating the Fund, funding it, and authorizing claim criteria that will allow it to make payments to, among others, Proud Boys and January 6 rioters, Defendants have inflicted concrete and cognizable harms on Plaintiffs Dunn and Hodges,’ the officers argued in their complaint. ‘The Fund's mere existence sends a clear and chilling message: those who enact violence in President Trump's name will not just avoid punishment, they will be rewarded with riches.’
"’This Fund creates enormous physical dangers for Officers Dunn and Hodges, who risked their lives on January 6, 2021, and who continue to do so by refusing to let that day be forgotten,’ wrote Public Integrity Project founder Brendan Ballou, who represents the officers. ‘The Fund is stunningly, blindingly illegal, and the defendants must be prohibited from transferring money to this corrupt and illegal monstrosity.’"
2 officers in Jan. 6 riot sue to block DOJ "anti-weaponization" fund - CBS News
The Trump Corruption (and not just this slush fund but the pay-to-play, the trading on non-public information, etc.) is going to have serious consequences for the party in November.
It’s the corruption, stupid! | The Spectator