https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/03/27/democrats-populist-trump-sanders-aoc-schumer/
The Wash Post. Wake up. Don’t be clueless. Every MAJOR outlet covers probably only Trump more than her. Algorithms 🤣
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/03/27/democrats-populist-trump-sanders-aoc-schumer/
The Wash Post. Wake up. Don’t be clueless. Every MAJOR outlet covers probably only Trump more than her. Algorithms 🤣
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/03/27/democrats-populist-trump-sanders-aoc-schumer/
The Wash Post. Wake up. Don’t be clueless. Every MAJOR outlet covers probably only Trump more than her. Algorithms 🤣
you are clueless to how these algorithms work. You're obsessed with "woke" and the algorithms are fueling your anger. I get almost nothing about AOC and very little about the New York mayor. Now I do search for info on them occasionally.@mrhighlife You cannot possibly be this clueless. It’s because she is who mainstream covers more than anyone else by many multiples.
CBS
you are clueless to how these algorithms work. You're obsessed with "woke" and the algorithms are fueling your anger. I get almost nothing about AOC and very little about the New York mayor. Now I do search for info on them occasionally.@mrhighlife You cannot possibly be this clueless. It’s because she is who mainstream covers more than anyone else by many multiples.
CBS
@mrhighlife You’re missing the point entirely. Your algorithm might be porn, Hoosiers, and BBQ tips. It’s unique to YOU! So what. That’s meaningless. National coverage by the major networks cover AOC more than anyone. Hence ABC, CBS, NYT Times. It has zero to do with an algorithm.
thanks for proving my point. I get plenty of articles from those news outlets. Just not many, if any, about AOC. You are obsessed with her and WOKE! Congrats.@mrhighlife You’re missing the point entirely. Your algorithm might be porn, Hoosiers, and BBQ tips. It’s unique to YOU! So what. That’s meaningless. National coverage by the major networks cover AOC more than anyone. Hence ABC, CBS, NYT Times. It has zero to do with an algorithm.
And you're right about the Hoosiers. I get that CBS 60 Minutes piece in my feeds daily.
@mrhighlife You still don't understand. I'm at a loss to help you. I'm not obsessed with anything. If we are discussing politics I don't like woke; conversely you are in denial.
But as to the point who gives a shit what your feed is as it doesn't matter. It is unique to you. If I log onto NYT or Wash Post or CBS/NBC/ABC they aren't crafting stories unique to each individual. They are writing a finite number. If they say they are going to do 25 political stories in a week and 5 mention AOC that means AOC is getting the attention. That has nothing to do with you or me. It has to do with the nation. Who is in the nation's eye. How are you missing this point? If I say eh I'm only going to check out Home and Garden of course I won't see AOC. That isn't the point when the discussion is about who is leading the Dem party. I don't care about my personal feed. I care about who the media is promoting and helping drive the national narrative. It matters.
Can you link some Dem candidates that have openly discussed the need to roll back DEI, immigration, etc? Maybe Fetterman, but based on your claims, we should see most if not all of them speaking about this. Why do you think they will suddenly change course on this stuff?
You do know there was a fairly strict, bi-partisan border bill in 2024 that Republicans had killed so Trump could run on border security, right? And call up your local college/university and ask to be patched through to the DEI office. Or look up most corporations' websites and look for their DEI statements.
No one talks about DEI anymore because that battle was lost for Democrats. Republicans will keep beating that dead horse, but DEI really isn't a significant thing anymore.
These changes have happened under your nose, but Trump is still essentially campaigning against all of it.
How does who is the mayor of New York impact your day to day life in St. Louis Carmel? George Soros is 95 years old. It's time to pick a new boogeyman. If Dems win big in the midterms, it won't be on a platform of defunding the police or transgender bathroom laws.
The emotional toxicity people like Soros, Mamdani, Fry, Walz, the Squad, and others produce seeps into the heads of weak-minded liberals. Renee Good’s story is much bigger than the moment she was killed. The environment she and others created that day was not just stupid and useless, it turned out the be dangerous. She and her wife behaved like self-absorbed 8th-graders. This toxicity indeed comes from all of today’s Democrats. Any of them who might want to start a level-headed discussion are pushed to the back of the bus.
@ohio-guy That bill was laughable. It codified an enormous number getting through and was a joke. It was stupid to pass then and with the benefit of time passing we now know just how stupid that bill was as it wasn't in the least bit "strict."
thanks for proving my point. I get plenty of articles from those news outlets. Just not many, if any, about AOC. You are obsessed with her and WOKE! Congrats.@mrhighlife You’re missing the point entirely. Your algorithm might be porn, Hoosiers, and BBQ tips. It’s unique to YOU! So what. That’s meaningless. National coverage by the major networks cover AOC more than anyone. Hence ABC, CBS, NYT Times. It has zero to do with an algorithm.
And you're right about the Hoosiers. I get that CBS 60 Minutes piece in my feeds daily.
Wanna bet a pair of premium natty tix that she’s listed as a leading contender on most, if not all discussions/polls/etc covering the 2028 election?
@ohio-guy That bill was laughable. It codified an enormous number getting through and was a joke. It was stupid to pass then and with the benefit of time passing we now know just how stupid that bill was as it wasn't in the least bit "strict."
It doesn't matter how you feel about the bill. It was bi-partisan and regardless if you think it would have been effective or not (bi-partisan support tends to point to the policies were favorable), it was aimed at reigning in illegal border crossings and immigration. Democrats have and did acknowledge immigration reform was important. Kamala Harris was running on stricter border security and harsher penalties for illegal entry into the country.
If you're not recognizing all that, you're stuck on some sort of revisionist bend.
Latest Post: Robert Mueller Our newest member: Tom Dillman Recent Posts Unread Posts
