Good grief.
Nick Fuentes is a freak sideshow. If you read the Guardian and Times rants, you quickly see that the so-called civil war as not about Fuentes’ followers, ( which seem to number in the thousands) but how the main stream millions should react to him. The controversy is over the likes of Tucker interviewing him. That is hardly much of a civil war among republicans. Unlike the democrats who actually elect far left wackos to high office, Fuentes actually gets little traction no matter how many people give him an interview platform.
I hope you're right. Fuentes has a million followers on X/Twitter.Good grief.
Nick Fuentes is a freak sideshow. If you read the Guardian and Times rants, you quickly see that the so-called civil war as not about Fuentes’ followers, ( which seem to number in the thousands) but how the main stream millions should react to him. The controversy is over the likes of Tucker interviewing him. That is hardly much of a civil war among republicans. Unlike the democrats who actually elect far left wackos to high office, Fuentes actually gets little traction no matter how many people give him an interview platform.
People on the left used to say the same thing about the whackiest of the intersectionalist, CRT etc. in the '90s that became the Woke movement that has now seeped into the mainstream. Same for the DSA--a fringe party that now has rising popularity.
Fuentes followers and supporters are made up. Apparently, much of this Fuentes Republican civil war claptrap is stoked by overseas internet goons intent on weakening the GOP.
I hope you're right. Fuentes has a million followers on X/Twitter.Good grief.
Nick Fuentes is a freak sideshow. If you read the Guardian and Times rants, you quickly see that the so-called civil war as not about Fuentes’ followers, ( which seem to number in the thousands) but how the main stream millions should react to him. The controversy is over the likes of Tucker interviewing him. That is hardly much of a civil war among republicans. Unlike the democrats who actually elect far left wackos to high office, Fuentes actually gets little traction no matter how many people give him an interview platform.
People on the left used to say the same thing about the whackiest of the intersectionalist, CRT etc. in the '90s that became the Woke movement that has now seeped into the mainstream. Same for the DSA--a fringe party that now has rising popularity.
Come on Brad. This shit should be beneath you. Look, the country use to be 90% white. It's now less than 60% and when you look at new births it's closing in on 40%. Whites are steadily decreasing in the U.S. and globally. Not to mention we're importing millions of people and almost none of them are white. This shit is pure propaganda Brad.
So Ben Shapiro is engaging in the propoganda? I don't agree with a lof of what Shapiro says, but I recognize he's an intelligent guy who would probably not fall for that.I hope you're right. Fuentes has a million followers on X/Twitter.Good grief.
Nick Fuentes is a freak sideshow. If you read the Guardian and Times rants, you quickly see that the so-called civil war as not about Fuentes’ followers, ( which seem to number in the thousands) but how the main stream millions should react to him. The controversy is over the likes of Tucker interviewing him. That is hardly much of a civil war among republicans. Unlike the democrats who actually elect far left wackos to high office, Fuentes actually gets little traction no matter how many people give him an interview platform.
People on the left used to say the same thing about the whackiest of the intersectionalist, CRT etc. in the '90s that became the Woke movement that has now seeped into the mainstream. Same for the DSA--a fringe party that now has rising popularity.
Come on Brad. This shit should be beneath you. Look, the country use to be 90% white. It's now less than 60% and when you look at new births it's closing in on 40%. Whites are steadily decreasing in the U.S. and globally. Not to mention we're importing millions of people and almost none of them are white. This shit is pure propaganda Brad.
Plus, all the facts you list are the precise things people like Fuentes point to to support their views and why it's important to push back.
Link?Fuentes followers and supporters are made up. Apparently, much of this Fuentes Republican civil war claptrap is stoked by overseas internet goons intent on weakening the GOP.
So Ben Shapiro is engaging in the propoganda? I don't agree with a lof of what Shapiro says, but I recognize he's an intelligent guy who would probably not fall for that.I hope you're right. Fuentes has a million followers on X/Twitter.Good grief.
Nick Fuentes is a freak sideshow. If you read the Guardian and Times rants, you quickly see that the so-called civil war as not about Fuentes’ followers, ( which seem to number in the thousands) but how the main stream millions should react to him. The controversy is over the likes of Tucker interviewing him. That is hardly much of a civil war among republicans. Unlike the democrats who actually elect far left wackos to high office, Fuentes actually gets little traction no matter how many people give him an interview platform.
People on the left used to say the same thing about the whackiest of the intersectionalist, CRT etc. in the '90s that became the Woke movement that has now seeped into the mainstream. Same for the DSA--a fringe party that now has rising popularity.
Come on Brad. This shit should be beneath you. Look, the country use to be 90% white. It's now less than 60% and when you look at new births it's closing in on 40%. Whites are steadily decreasing in the U.S. and globally. Not to mention we're importing millions of people and almost none of them are white. This shit is pure propaganda Brad.
Plus, all the facts you list are the precise things people like Fuentes point to to support their views and why it's important to push back.
Whatever dude.
Curtain has just been opened with Musks X feature showing country of origin for posts. More to come.
Just to be clear, I'm not accusing you of sharing Fuentes views. I'm pointing out that he uses those facts to advance his own views.So Ben Shapiro is engaging in the propoganda? I don't agree with a lof of what Shapiro says, but I recognize he's an intelligent guy who would probably not fall for that.I hope you're right. Fuentes has a million followers on X/Twitter.Good grief.
Nick Fuentes is a freak sideshow. If you read the Guardian and Times rants, you quickly see that the so-called civil war as not about Fuentes’ followers, ( which seem to number in the thousands) but how the main stream millions should react to him. The controversy is over the likes of Tucker interviewing him. That is hardly much of a civil war among republicans. Unlike the democrats who actually elect far left wackos to high office, Fuentes actually gets little traction no matter how many people give him an interview platform.
People on the left used to say the same thing about the whackiest of the intersectionalist, CRT etc. in the '90s that became the Woke movement that has now seeped into the mainstream. Same for the DSA--a fringe party that now has rising popularity.
Come on Brad. This shit should be beneath you. Look, the country use to be 90% white. It's now less than 60% and when you look at new births it's closing in on 40%. Whites are steadily decreasing in the U.S. and globally. Not to mention we're importing millions of people and almost none of them are white. This shit is pure propaganda Brad.
Plus, all the facts you list are the precise things people like Fuentes point to to support their views and why it's important to push back.
Whatever dude.
Good grief.
Nick Fuentes is a freak sideshow. If you read the Guardian and Times rants, you quickly see that the so-called civil war as not about Fuentes’ followers, ( which seem to number in the thousands) but how the main stream millions should react to him. The controversy is over the likes of Tucker interviewing him. That is hardly much of a civil war among republicans. Unlike the democrats who actually elect far left wackos to high office, Fuentes actually gets little traction no matter how many people give him an interview platform.
The Washington Establishment media goes out of its way to elevate fringe, nutcase, Republicans, in order to try and make them the face of Americans that simply want government to repent their interests. That's what the media did with David Duke, a nutcase that none of us would have otherwise known.
Both sides do it.Good grief.
Nick Fuentes is a freak sideshow. If you read the Guardian and Times rants, you quickly see that the so-called civil war as not about Fuentes’ followers, ( which seem to number in the thousands) but how the main stream millions should react to him. The controversy is over the likes of Tucker interviewing him. That is hardly much of a civil war among republicans. Unlike the democrats who actually elect far left wackos to high office, Fuentes actually gets little traction no matter how many people give him an interview platform.
The Washington Establishment media goes out of its way to elevate fringe, nutcase, Republicans, in order to try and make them the face of Americans that simply want government to repent their interests. That's what the media did with David Duke, a nutcase that none of us would have otherwise known.
https://twitter.com/swipewright/status/1998050582850834501?s=46
It looks like the Nick Fuentes fear is manufactured bullshit @bradstevens.

I sure as hell don't like David Duke and heavily criticized him when he was a thing. He won elective office in Louisiana and ran competitive races for Senate and Governor in Louisiana too. He had plenty of racist followers in the state and elsewhere.Good grief.
Nick Fuentes is a freak sideshow. If you read the Guardian and Times rants, you quickly see that the so-called civil war as not about Fuentes’ followers, ( which seem to number in the thousands) but how the main stream millions should react to him. The controversy is over the likes of Tucker interviewing him. That is hardly much of a civil war among republicans. Unlike the democrats who actually elect far left wackos to high office, Fuentes actually gets little traction no matter how many people give him an interview platform.
The Washington Establishment media goes out of its way to elevate fringe, nutcase, Republicans, in order to try and make them the face of Americans that simply want government to repent their interests. That's what the media did with David Duke, a nutcase that none of us would have otherwise known.

