https://twitter.com/tng512/status/1891263364271075411?s=46
The issue is the money.
We agree wrt to inflating the money supply but this is not the first inflationary cycle in U.S. history. Somehow my parents braved 13% inflation and a 12% interest rate on their first home and still were able to pop out four kids. Their whole generation did. Somehow their parents, my grandparents, were able to grow up during the Great Depression and have kids.
It’s not uncommon for young people to think they have the toughest economic circumstances that ever were. What is troubling is the growing number of those in older generations enabling that self-centered, lack of perspective.
So excuse me if I don’t buy “student loan debt” as the reason for plummeting birth rates. I think it’s completely bunk.
You're nuts.
https://twitter.com/Geiger_Capital/status/1942577128907624693?t=9GS1s3ugIZRw_WmmRbaTnw&s=19
https://twitter.com/Budgetdog_/status/1948466311438180398?t=pA9lDHiSFOLo3fu57DkZaQ&s=19
https://twitter.com/unusual_whales/status/1927750964175642940?t=dnBkkcPl604i_fAN1UDz5w&s=19
I can see you are confused so let me help you. The average home is over 150% larger than it was in 1980. Bigger homes are more expensive (see if you can find a tweet to confirm this).
https://twitter.com/tng512/status/1891263364271075411?s=46
The issue is the money.
Looking at the sharp curve on the right, those can't all be little Elons and MCM666s. So money has always been a factor, at least in the time those 3 lines represent. But not the factor today in why birth rate has dropped pretty much across the board.
@carramrod do you think today's houses are made out of better materials? Also, do you think they take up more or less square footage of land overall? I assume there are a lot more condos today and etc.
@arthur-dent I don't disagree there are other factors for it. I just think the main driver is the money.
How do you ever fix this? Liberal white women won’t have kids so we are being replaced.
I think you should answer Brad's inquiry. I don't see how we can honestly respond to your thread starter without you explaining who "we" are in this complaint. It too easily lends toward assumptions.
How do you ever fix this? Liberal white women won’t have kids so we are being replaced.
I think you should answer Brad's inquiry. I don't see how we can honestly respond to your thread starter without you explaining who "we" are in this complaint. It too easily lends toward assumptions.
People that want to see society continue to prosper in a peaceful and productive manner.
@dbm, If you're worried about liberal white women propagating their genes, why? Don't you think they're all mentally defective? White men can still propagate, by having sex with white independents and white conservatives (here there, Sydney Sweeney, how you doin'?) and people not designated white of all political stripes.How do you ever fix this? Liberal white women won’t have kids so we are being replaced.
I think you should answer Brad's inquiry. I don't see how we can honestly respond to your thread starter without you explaining who "we" are in this complaint. It too easily lends toward assumptions.
Hell, pasty white skin sucks. Everyone prefers white chicks when they're tan anyway. So let's just all co-mingle, make as many people with more tinted skin as possible, and be done with it. Bonus: no more race baiting and racism.
@goat how is white people seizing to exist a good thing for society/humans?
How do you ever fix this? Liberal white women won’t have kids so we are being replaced.
I think you should answer Brad's inquiry. I don't see how we can honestly respond to your thread starter without you explaining who "we" are in this complaint. It too easily lends toward assumptions.
People that want to see society continue to prosper in a peaceful and productive manner.
What does that have to do with liberal white women not having kids?
@snarlcakes lol! His gravedigger sweatshirt is impossible to pair with any outfit - even sweats
@goat I don't know how to make the question any clearer.
The problem isn't that the question is unclear. The problem is that it's ridiculous. You seem to be assuming that OP was bemoaning the loss of white people in the population, which is exactly the kind of assumption I was trying to avoid by asking for more clarification. You further seem to assume that not buying into this must mean that one thinks losing white people in the population is somehow a benefit? I mean, if your question can't be "any clearer," then I don't know where else to go with it.
Maybe it's not as clear as you think. Feel free to take care of that.
@dbm, If you're worried about liberal white women propagating their genes, why? Don't you think they're all mentally defective? White men can still propagate, by having sex with white independents and white conservatives (here there, Sydney Sweeney, how you doin'?) and people not designated white of all political stripes.How do you ever fix this? Liberal white women won’t have kids so we are being replaced.
I think you should answer Brad's inquiry. I don't see how we can honestly respond to your thread starter without you explaining who "we" are in this complaint. It too easily lends toward assumptions.
Hell, pasty white skin sucks. Everyone prefers white chicks when they're tan anyway. So let's just all co-mingle, make as many people with more tinted skin as possible, and be done with it. Bonus: no more race baiting and racism.
The Bulworth Solution.
Latest Post: Anyone remember La Bamba restaurant Our newest member: Doug Beder Recent Posts Unread Posts
