@bulk-vh congrats you're a gadfly on threads as people converse. sad you're not funny. at least that would be redeeming
Your use of stoll's assertion about me as some sort of insult was pretty weak. His opinion is inconsequential.
I am glad your daddy QParker has ungrounded you from posting. He didn't have to spank you so hard in public, though. That was wrong.
.
@bulk-vh we're discussing something serious here and here you are just posting garbage. go away. you're not funny. not clever. sorry stoll hurt your feelings with his accuracy
@bulk-vh we're discussing something serious here and here you are just posting garbage. go away. you're not funny. not clever. sorry stoll hurt your feelings with his accuracy
The only hurt feelings here are obviously yours. You're not QParker, and I'm not you, so I'll post when and where I like.
.
@bulk-vh hmmmm do you think you're really contributing to this thread. or is what you are being accused of literally what you are doing.... @stollcpa congrats you called it. at least you had the good sense to remove your signature. incriminating and all
@bulk-vh hmmmm do you think you're really contributing to this thread. or is what you are being accused of literally what you are doing.... @stollcpa congrats you called it. at least you had the good sense to remove your signature. incriminating and all
stoll again? LOL. I already told you he is inconsequential. Do better. You would think someone who has over 15,000 posts (or more...I'm being charitable on that) on two boards the last couple of years would have more to say, or would be better at saying it.
Now, back to your important conversations. Unless you can't help yourself to reply to my gadfly post.
.
@bulk-vh lmao go for a walk. your "contributions" here are worthless. if you could do better you certainly would have shown it by now.
that Mt Sinai/Harvard/etc. report was not a new study - it was a meta analysis of previous studies, including crappy ones. It stands on weaker legs than when you look at pictures of Laura Loomer.@noodle you're conflating two things. 1) that mount sinai harvard yale hopkins and many other credible sources are finding associations. that doesn't mean causation. but it's worth continuing to research and 2) that trump will be responsible about it and will exaggerate. the latter i have no doubt. and is that irresponsible? sure. but it doesn't bear on the credible research being done that you were quick to dismiss
Earlier this year Trump and RFK Jr promised to tell us what causes autism by this month. And here we are. THAT is what people will take away from today’s clown show: they found the demon and its Tylenol. yay.
@bulk-vh lmao go for a walk. your "contributions" here are worthless. if you could do better you certainly would have shown it by now.
I knew you couldn't resist. You never can. It's a character flaw with you. A weakness that shows your thin skin.
Go have your important conversations. I'll read and stay out of the way...but, you won't be able to do it, will you?
.
@noodle there are countless others as well. from hopkins etc. and again associations don't equate to causation. but why not continue to study same? it's irresponsible not to. and yes it's irresponsible to make the leap from associations to causation as trump will do.
below is a perfect summation
https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/11/05/acetaminophen-pregnancy-autism-adhd/
there might be something there. associations exist. let's continue to explore and see what we learn
and don't tell people they don't know what they're talking about. i've read studies and med records for actions and mdls from vaginal mesh cases to zimmer stryker fuckups to my own kid for 30 years
Autism was first described in the US in 1943. Tylenol wasn’t sold in the US until 1955.
I guess Trump getting elected caused 9/11, right? Same nonsense.
Tylenol use had gone down over the past 25 years, while diagnosis of ASD has gone up.
Make it make sense.
"You can't make someone listen to reason if they aren't willing to think"-- Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
@shooter write to Harvard Yale Hopkins Mount Sinai and others they are wasting their time
I am familiar with that study. Problem is acetaminophen stays in the bloodstream for only a few days. So it’s a giant leap to glean a link between acetaminophen and autism based on whether the mother took the drug 2-3 days before giving birth. I never said it shouldn’t be studied further. I said nothing even remotely like that. But what Trump and RFK Jr did today is appalling - unless I suppose you’re a plaintiff’s lawyer. Today is like ten Christmases for RFK Jr’s pals.@noodle there are countless others as well. from hopkins etc. and again associations don't equate to causation. but why not continue to study same? it's irresponsible not to. and yes it's irresponsible to make the leap from associations to causation as trump will do.
below is a perfect summation
https://hub.jhu.edu/2019/11/05/acetaminophen-pregnancy-autism-adhd/
there might be something there. associations exist. let's continue to explore and see what we learn
and don't tell people they don't know what they're talking about. i've read studies and med records for actions and mdls from vaginal mesh cases to zimmer stryker fuckups to my own kid for 30 years
Latest Post: 2027 HS Recruiting News Our newest member: Redd Collects Recent Posts Unread Posts
