Epstein files that don’t indict him at all.
You appear to be less than fully informed.
Justice Department publishes documents with sexual assault allegations against Trump - POLITICO
You understand the FBI operated a public tip line for all things Epstein? Meaning that any manic schizophrenic could call the number and claim that Trump and Epstein raped them on a craps table in Atlantic City back in 1988. And that they had to bite Trump’s dick to get away.
And the FBI would take that and create an intake form which now goes in the “Epstein files”.
Morons that peddle this shit are the same ones that forwarded golden showers by Russian hookers. That’s you, you’re the moron.
Epstein files that don’t indict him at all.
You appear to be less than fully informed.
Justice Department publishes documents with sexual assault allegations against Trump - POLITICO
You understand the FBI operated a public tip line for all things Epstein? Meaning that any manic schizophrenic could call the number and claim that Trump and Epstein raped them on a craps table in Atlantic City back in 1988. And that they had to bite Trump’s dick to get away.
And the FBI would take that and create an intake form which now goes in the “Epstein files”.
Morons that peddle this shit are the same ones that forwarded golden showers by Russian hookers. That’s you, you’re the moron.
Let's recap. You claimed that the Epstein Files didn't implicate Trump. That claim was either a function of your being misinformed or a bald-faced lie. When I pointed that out, you pivoted to attacking the complainant, notwithstanding that you know nothing about her. Then you felt compelled to level a parting shot at me, because you had nothing else.
I saw earlier in the thread that you're on the verge of being banned again. It's not surprising. You need to get control of your emotions.
Trump claimed yesterday and early this morning that regime change has already occurred in Iran and we're now dealing with "much more reasonable" people. Then, this morning on ABC, Marco Rubio said this about current Iranian leadership: "These people are lunatics. They are insane. They’re religious zealots who can never be allowed to possess a nuclear weapon because they have an apocalyptic vision of the future."
Two very different messages, but not really a quandary because one messenger has credibility and the other has none.
Is there anyone here who accepts at face value anything that comes out of Trump's mouth or anything that he posts on his social media platform? I assume he's lying unless proven otherwise.
Trump Claims ‘Regime Change’ in Iran Is Already Complete - The New York Times
Epstein files that don’t indict him at all.
You appear to be less than fully informed.
Justice Department publishes documents with sexual assault allegations against Trump - POLITICO
You understand the FBI operated a public tip line for all things Epstein? Meaning that any manic schizophrenic could call the number and claim that Trump and Epstein raped them on a craps table in Atlantic City back in 1988. And that they had to bite Trump’s dick to get away.
And the FBI would take that and create an intake form which now goes in the “Epstein files”.
Morons that peddle this shit are the same ones that forwarded golden showers by Russian hookers. That’s you, you’re the moron.
Let's recap. You claimed that the Epstein Files didn't implicate Trump. That claim was either a function of your being misinformed or a bald-faced lie. When I pointed that out, you pivoted to attacking the complainant, notwithstanding that you know nothing about her. Then you felt compelled to level a parting shot at me, because you had nothing else.
I saw earlier in the thread that you're on the verge of being banned again. It's not surprising. You need to get control of your emotions.
There’s a homeless guy by my local Walgreens who claims that he killed JFK.
I think it’s nonsense if you ask me. But if that same homeless guy called the FBI and claimed Trump and Epstein raped him, it would go in the files.
Allegations are not proof of anything. At least not in this country.
Your hatred of Trump allows you to lend credence to anything negative you hear about him. Because you’re a shallow thinker.
There’s a homeless guy by my local Walgreens who claims that he killed JFK.
I think it’s nonsense if you ask me. But if that same homeless guy called the FBI and claimed Trump and Epstein raped him, it would go in the files.
Allegations are not proof of anything. At least not in this country.
Out of curiosity, did you apply that same logic to everything with regards to Joe Biden / Hunter Biden when the myriad of allegations of influence and bribery were being thrown around?
There’s a homeless guy by my local Walgreens who claims that he killed JFK.
I think it’s nonsense if you ask me. But if that same homeless guy called the FBI and claimed Trump and Epstein raped him, it would go in the files.
Allegations are not proof of anything. At least not in this country.
Out of curiosity, did you apply that same logic to everything with regards to Joe Biden / Hunter Biden when the myriad of allegations of influence and bribery were being thrown around?
I thought the paper trail on the CEFC cash was pretty compelling.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t_rjRXDkI1w&pp=ygUfQnlyb24gZGluYWxkcyBiaWRlbiBwYXBlciB0cmFpbA%3D%3D
"The UAE has emerged as perhaps the most hawkish of the Gulf countries and is pushing hard for Trump to order a ground invasion, the diplomat said. Kuwait and Bahrain also favor this option."
https://apnews.com/article/trump-iran-saudi-arabia-mbs-gulf-war-uae-89f690b952fe28d3140c537b70fa5051
"The UAE has emerged as perhaps the most hawkish of the Gulf countries and is pushing hard for Trump to order a ground invasion, the diplomat said. Kuwait and Bahrain also favor this option."
https://apnews.com/article/trump-iran-saudi-arabia-mbs-gulf-war-uae-89f690b952fe28d3140c537b70fa5051
Gulf states are between a rock and a hard place.
We’ve put them in a very precarious position. At the end of the day, they like us much more than Iran.
But leaving this regime intact means chaos for them. So they want us to continue. Despite missiles being flung at them.
I think more than anything the fact that Trump is so much more friendly to the Gulf than any American President before him works in our favor in turning the entire ME against Iran.
Will the same people who claim Trump is a puppet of Israel now say he is a puppet of these states?"The UAE has emerged as perhaps the most hawkish of the Gulf countries and is pushing hard for Trump to order a ground invasion, the diplomat said. Kuwait and Bahrain also favor this option."
https://apnews.com/article/trump-iran-saudi-arabia-mbs-gulf-war-uae-89f690b952fe28d3140c537b70fa5051
If not, I wonder what could possibly be the difference?
I think more than anything the fact that Trump is so much more friendly to the Gulf than any American President before him works in our favor in turning the entire ME against Iran.
I do think that's a valid point. For whatever reason, Trump has somehow cobbled together a pretty solid relationship with the Arab governments. Maybe not the Arab world writ large, but at least the leaders. That should continue to pay occasional dividends for years.
That said, I don't think the Arabs needed much pushing to turn against Iran. They don't like the Persians. They don't like the Kurds. They don't like the Shia (excepting Iraq, of course). And they certainly don't trust any of them. Lesser of many evils, most of them would probably prefer the Saudis or Egyptians as hegemons over the Iranians. So credit Trump for shoring up a shaky alliance, but I don't think he really needed to convince them of how dangerous Iran was.
Will the same people who claim Trump is a puppet of Israel now say he is a puppet of these states?"The UAE has emerged as perhaps the most hawkish of the Gulf countries and is pushing hard for Trump to order a ground invasion, the diplomat said. Kuwait and Bahrain also favor this option."
https://apnews.com/article/trump-iran-saudi-arabia-mbs-gulf-war-uae-89f690b952fe28d3140c537b70fa5051
If not, I wonder what could possibly be the difference?
Well, no, they won't, because the people who distrust AIPAC and the people who distrust CAIR, et al. are not the same people.
And the difference is that AIPAC spends about 100x what Arab/Muslim lobbyists spend on American politics.
I think more than anything the fact that Trump is so much more friendly to the Gulf than any American President before him works in our favor in turning the entire ME against Iran.
I do think that's a valid point. For whatever reason, Trump has somehow cobbled together a pretty solid relationship with the Arab governments. Maybe not the Arab world writ large, but at least the leaders. That should continue to pay occasional dividends for years.
That said, I don't think the Arabs needed much pushing to turn against Iran. They don't like the Persians. They don't like the Kurds. They don't like the Shia (excepting Iraq, of course). And they certainly don't trust any of them. Lesser of many evils, most of them would probably prefer the Saudis or Egyptians as hegemons over the Iranians. So credit Trump for shoring up a shaky alliance, but I don't think he really needed to convince them of how dangerous Iran was.
Like virtually everything with Trump, money is the driver. Arab countries have purchased large quantities of American military equipment. They’ve invested huge sums in many sectors of the US economy, and they’ve made Trump and his family much richer.
Arab countries like that Trump gives them a pass on human rights issues. Trump, in turn, likes dealing with authoritarian strongmen like MBS because those leaders don’t have to deal with pesky institutions like parliaments or independent judiciaries. Makes for easy deals and quick results.
I can't think of one President that hasn't given Arab oil countries some kind of "pass on human rights issues."Arab countries like that Trump gives them a pass on human rights issues.
Re MBS, for example:
MBS, by the way, is a complicated figure:
https://www.econtalk.org/the-man-who-would-be-king-of-saudi-arabia-with-karen-elliott-house/
I don't think that's the only difference you can think of and we both know where the "puppet" language originates. It's one of the oldest conspiracy theories in the world.Will the same people who claim Trump is a puppet of Israel now say he is a puppet of these states?"The UAE has emerged as perhaps the most hawkish of the Gulf countries and is pushing hard for Trump to order a ground invasion, the diplomat said. Kuwait and Bahrain also favor this option."
https://apnews.com/article/trump-iran-saudi-arabia-mbs-gulf-war-uae-89f690b952fe28d3140c537b70fa5051
If not, I wonder what could possibly be the difference?
Well, no, they won't, because the people who distrust AIPAC and the people who distrust CAIR, et al. are not the same people.
And the difference is that AIPAC spends about 100x what Arab/Muslim lobbyists spend on American politics.
Latest Post: Iran War Has Started Our newest member: Steven Ross Recent Posts Unread Posts
